Page 250 - Privacy in a Cyber Age Policy and Practice
P. 250

238  NOTES

              Law Review 28 (2000): 479; Sepideh Esmaili, “Searching for a Needle in a Hay-
              stack,” 495.
           54.  Mark A. Rothstein and Meghan K. Talbott, “The Expanding Use of DNA in
              Law Enforcement: What Role for Privacy?” Journal of Law, Medicine, and Eth-
              ics 24 (2009): 156.
           55.  Sepideh Esmaili, “Searching for a Needle in a Haystack,” 495, 498–99.
           56.  Kevin Hartnett, “The DNA in Your Garbage: Up for Grabs,”  Boston Globe,
              May 12, 2013, http://www.bostonglobe.com/ideas/2013/05/11/the-dna-
              your-garbage-for-grabs/sU12MtVLkoypL1qu2iF6IL/story.html; see also
              Holly K. Fernandez, “Genetic Privacy, Abandonments, and DNA Dragnets:
              Is Fourth Amendment Jurisprudence Adequate?” Hastings Center Report 35
              (2005): 21.
           57.  California v. Greenwood, 486 U.S. 35 (1988).
           58.  Holly K. Fernandez, “Genetic Privacy, Abandonments, and DNA Dragnets:
              Is Fourth Amendment Jurisprudence Adequate?” Hastings Center Report 35
              (2005): 21.
           59.  Elizabeth E. Joh, “Reclaiming ‘Abandoned’ DNA: The Fourth Amendment and
              Genetic Privacy,” Northwestern University Law Review 100 (2006): 874, 875.
           60.  State v. Galloway and Hoesly, 109 P.3d 383 (Or. App. 2005).
           61.  This includes Hawaii and New Jersey (see Dennis Hevesi, “New Jersey Court
              Protects Trash From Police Searches,” New York Times, July 19, 1990); New
              Hampshire (Robert E. Williams, “New Hampshire and the Methodology of the
              New Judicial Federalism,” New Hampshire Bar Journal [Summer 2004]); New
              Mexico (Deborah Baker, “Court Says Privacy of Garbage Is Protected,” Associ-
              ated Press, June 11, 2006); Vermont (State v. Morris (94-299); 165 Vt 111; 680
              A.2d 90); and Washington (Hope Lynne Karp, “Trash: A Matter of Privacy?,”
              Pace Law Review 20 (2000): 541).
           62.  Kristy Holtfreter et al., “Public Perceptions of White-Collar Crime and Pun-
              ishment,” Journal of Criminal Justice 36, 1 (2008): 50.
           63.  Duana Fullwiley, “Can DNA Witness Race,”  Council for Responsible Genet-
              ics (2004), http://www.councilforresponsiblegenetics.org/genewatch/Gene-
              WatchPage.aspx?pageId=59&archive=yes.
           64.  See, for example, Tim Alamenciak, “OPP Faces Scrutiny over DNA Testing
              Sweep That Brought Racial-Profiling Complaint,”  The Star, March 3, 2014,
              http://www.thestar.com/news/gta/2014/03/03/police_watchdog_investigates_
              opp_over_dna_testing.html.
           65.  Howard Cooke, “DNA and Police Files,” Lancet 342, 8864 (1993): 130.
           66.  Michael Purtill, “Everybody’s Got a Price: Why Orange County’s Practice of
              Taking DNA Samples from Misdemeanor Arrestees is an Excessive Fine,” Jour-
              nal of Criminal Law and Criminology 101 (2011): 311; David Skinner, “The
              NDNAD Has No Ability in Itself to be Discriminatory: Ethnicity and the Gov-
              ernance of the UK National DNA Database,” Sociology 47 (2013): 977.
           67.  Mark Berman, “Texas Man Exonerated through DNA Testing He Didn’t Know
              was Going to Happen,”  Washington Post, July 25, 2014, http://www.wash-
              ingtonpost.com/news/post-nation/wp/2014/07/25/texas-man-exonerated-
              through-dna-testing-he-didnt-know-was-going-to-happen/.
   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255