Page 396 - Probability and Statistical Inference
P. 396

7. Point Estimation  373

                           sufficient for θ. We wish to estimate T(θ) = θ unbiasedly. Since U has its pdf
                           given by nu θ  I(0 < u < θ) we have E [X ] = n(n + 1)  θ. Hence, E [(n +
                                     n-1 -n
                                                                           -1
                                                             θ
                                                                                       θ
                                                               n:n
                                                        -1
                           1)n  X ] = θ so that W = (n + 1)n  X  is an unbiased estimator of θ. Thus,
                              -1
                                                           n:n
                                n:n
                           by the Lehmann-Scheffé Theorems, (n + 1)n  X  is the UMVUE for θ. Here,
                                                                -1
                                                                   n:n
                           the domain space  χ  for the X variable depends on ? itself. Hence, an approach
                           through the Cramér-Rao inequality is not feasible. !
                              Example 7.5.10 Suppose that X , ..., X  are iid N(µ, σ ) where µ and s are
                                                                           2
                                                              n
                                                        1
                           both unknown, −∞ < µ < ∞, 0 < σ < ∞ and  χ  = ℜ. Let us write θ = (µ, θ ) ∈
                                                                                        2
                           Θ = ℜ × ℜ  and we wish to estimate  T (θ) = µ unbiasedly. Recall from the
                                     +
                                                    2
                           Example 6.6.7 that U = ( , S ) is a complete sufficient statistic for θθ θθ θ. Obvi-
                           ously,      is an unbiased estimator of  T (θ) whereas is a function of U only.
                           Thus, by the Lehmann-Scheffé Theorems,     is the UMVUE for µ. Similarly,
                                                               2
                                            2
                           one can show that S  is the UMVUE for σ . The situation here involves two
                           unknown parameters µ and σ. Hence, an approach through the Cramér-Rao
                           inequality as stated will not be appropriate. !
                              Example 7.5.11 (Example 7.5.10 Continued) Suppose that X , ..., X  are iid
                                                                                1
                                                                                     n
                                                                                      χ
                           N(µ, σ ) where µ and σ are both unknown, −∞ < µ < ∞, 0 < σ < ∞ and   = ℜ.
                                2
                                             2
                                                           +
                           Let us write θθ θθ θ = (µ, θ ) ∈ Θ = ℜ × ℜ  and we wish to estimate T(?) = µ + s
                           unbiasedly. Now, U = (                            , S ) is a complete
                                                                               2
                           sufficient statistic for θθ θθ θ. From (2.3.26) for the moments of a gamma variable,
                           it follows that E [S] = a s where                            Thus
                                         θ      n
                                          is an unbiased estimator of  T(θ) and W depends only on U.
                           Hence, by the Lehmann-Scheffé Theorems,       is the UMVUE for µ +
                           σ. Similarly one can derive the UMVUE for the parametric function µσ  where
                                                                                     ?
                           ? is any real number. For k < 0, however, one should be particularly cautious
                           about the minimum required n. We leave this out as Exercise 7.5.7. !
                              Example 7.5.12 (Example 4.4.12 Continued) Suppose that X , ..., X  are
                                                                                  1
                                                                                        n
                                                                          -1
                           iid with the common negative exponential pdf f(x; θθ θθ θ) = σ  exp{−(x − µ)/σ}I(x
                           > µ) where µ and σ are both unknown, θθ θθ θ = (µ, σ) ∈ Θ = ℜ × ℜ , n = 2. Here,
                                                                                +
                           we wish to estimate  T(θ) = µ + σ, that is the mean of the population, unbi-
                           asedly.  Recall   from    Exercises   6.3.2   and   6.6.18   that
                                                     is a complete sufficient statistic for θθ θθ θ. Now,
                           is an unbiased estimator of  T(θ) and note that we can rewrite     =  Xn:1
                           +                  which shows that    depends only on U. Thus, by the
                           Lehmann-Scheffé Theorems,     is the UMVUE for µ+σ. Exploiting (2.3.26),
                                                                             k
                           one can derive the UMVUE for the parametric function µσ  where K is any
                           real number. For ? < 0, however, one should be particularly cautious about the
                           minimum required n. We leave this out as Exercise 7.5.8. !
   391   392   393   394   395   396   397   398   399   400   401