Page 590 - Probability and Statistical Inference
P. 590

12. Large-Sample Inference  567

                           H  : θ = 0 versus H  : θ > 0 with given level α ∈ (0, 1). Define Y  = I(X  > 0),
                                           1
                                                                                       i
                                                                                 i
                            0
                           that is Y  = 1 or 0 according as X  > 0 or X  ≤ 0, i = 1, ..., n.
                                  i
                                                       i
                                                               i
                              (i)   Show that Y , ..., Y  are iid Bernoulli(p) where p = ½ or p > ½
                                                    n
                                              1
                                    according as θ = 0 or θ > 0 respectively whatever be f;
                              (ii)  Argue that one can equivalently test H  : p = ½ versus H  : p > ½
                                                                    0               1
                                    with the help of the observations Y , ..., Y ;
                                                                       n
                                                                  1
                              (iii)  Propose an appropriate level a test from Section 12.3.1.
                              {Note: The associated Bernoulli parameter test is called a “Sign Test” be-
                           cause       counts the number of positive observations among the X’s. A
                           sign test is called nonparametric or distribution-free since the methodology
                           depending on Y’s does not use an explicit form of the function f.}
                              12.3.18 (Comparison of a Sign Test with a z Test in a Normal Distri-
                           bution) Suppose that X , ..., X  are iid N(µ, σ ) random variables where µ ∈
                                                                 2
                                                    n
                                               1
                           ℜ is assumed unknown, but σ ∈ ℜ  is known. The problem is to test H  : µ =
                                                        +
                                                                                      0
                           0 versus H  : µ > 0 with given level α ∈ (0, 1). Define Y  = I(X  > 0), that is Y
                                    1                                     i    i           i
                           = 1 or 0 according as X  > 0 or X  ≤ 0, i = 1, ..., n. The UMP level a test is
                                               i
                                                       i
                           expressed as follows:
                           Whereas α level a sign test from Exercise 12.3.17 will look like this for large
                           n:
                           Now, address the following problems.
                              (i)   Compare the powers of Test #1 and Test #2 when n = 30, 40,
                                    50, α = .05 and µ = .03, .02, .01 (which are close to µ = 0);
                              (ii)  Let us fix n = 50. Evaluate the sample sizes n , n , n  such that
                                                                          1
                                                                                3
                                                                             2
                                    the Test #2 with sample size n = n , n = n , n = n  has respec
                                                                              3
                                                                 1
                                                                       2
                                    tively the same power as that of Test #1, used with n = 50, at µ
                                    = .03, .02, .01;
                              (iii)  How does n , n , n  compare with n = 50? Any comments?
                                              1
                                                    3
                                                 2
                              {Note: Such investigations eventually lead to a notion called the Bahadur
                           efficiency. Refer to Bahadur (1971).}
                                                                                  2
                              12.4.1 Suppose that X , ..., X  are iid with the common N(µ, σ ) distribu-
                                                      n
                                                1
                           tion where the parameters µ ∈ ℜ, σ ∈ ℜ . Thus,        is asymptoti-
                                                             +
                           cally (as n → ∞) distributed as N(0, 2σ ) where S  is the sample variance.
                                                             4
                                                                      2
                                                                      n
                           Find the variance stabilizing transformation of S 2
                                                                    n.
                              12.4.2 Suppose that X , ..., X  are iid with the common exponential distri-
                                                1     n
                           bution having the mean β (> 0). Thus,       is asymptotically (as n →
                                               2
                           ∞) distributed as N(0, β ) where     is the sample mean. Find the variance
                           stabilizing transformation of   .
   585   586   587   588   589   590   591   592   593   594   595