Page 264 - Psychological Management of Individual Performance

248 enhancing performance through goal-setting and feedback interventions
Algera, J. A., & Van den Hurk, A. M. C. M. (1997). Testing the feasibility of ProMES before
implementation: A case study in the Dutch steel industry. In R. D. Pritchard (Ed.), Productivity
measurement and improvement: Organizational case studies. New York: Praeger.
Algera, J. A., Van Tuijl, H. F. J. M., & Janssen, P. M. (1995). Pitfalls in implementing participative
management of work groups: Dutch experiences in the design process of ProMES. Paper
presented at the conference on participative management of work groups, October 19–20,
Dortmund, Germany.
Janssen, P. M., Van Berkel, A., & Stolk, J. (1995). ProMES as part of a new management strategy.
In R. D. Pritchard (Ed.), Productivity measurement and improvement: Organizational case
studies. New York: Praeger.
Kleingeld, P. A. M. (1994). Performance management in a field service department: Design and
transportation of a productivity measurement and enhancement system (ProMES). Unpub-
lished doctoral dissertation. Faculty of Technology Management, Eindhoven University of
Technology.
Latham, G. P., & Saari, L. M. (1979). Application of social-learning theory to training supervisors
through behaviour modelling. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64 (3), 239–246.
Latham, G. P., & Wexley, K. N. (1981, 1994). Increasing productivity through performance
appraisal. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley.
Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (1990). A theory of goal setting and task performance. Englewood
Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
Meeks, M. (1994). Continuous improvement through performance management: Application of
a performance management system within section CGSM of OFS2, Hoogovens IJmuiden.
Unpublished masters thesis. Faculty of Technology Management, Eindhoven University of
Technology.
Pritchard, R. D. (1990). Measuring and improving organizational productivity: A practical guide.
New York: Praeger.
Pritchard, R. D. (Ed.) (1995). Productivity measurement and improvement: Organizational case
studies. New York: Praeger.
Pritchard, R. D., & Roth, Ph. J. (1991). Accounting for non-linear utility functions in composite
measures of productivity and performance. Organisational Behaviour and Human Decision
Processes, 50, 341–359.
Rodgers, R., & Hunter, J. E. (1991). Impact of Management By Objectives on organizational
productivity. Journal of Applied Psychology, Monograph, 76, 322–336.
Schmidt, K.-H., & Kleinbeck, U. (1997). Relationships between group-based performance mea-
sures, feedback and organizational context factors. European Journal of Work and Organiza-
tional Psychology, 6, 303–319.
Van Tuijl, H. F. J. M. (1997). Critical success factors in developing ProMES: will the end result be
an “accepted control loop”? Leadership and Organisation Development Journal, 18, 346–354.
Van Tuijl, H. F. J. M., Kleingeld, A., Schmidt, K., Kleinbeck, U., Pritchard, R. D., & Algera,
J. A. (1997). Measuring and enhancing organizational productivity by means of ProMES:
Three practical implications. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 6,
279–301.