Page 298 - Psychological Management of Individual Performance
P. 298

how to select the right trainer                                   283
                        it is important to bear in mind that external consultants do not always find it easy to tailor
                        their knowledge and use of examples to fit the business context of a specific company.


                        HOW TO ASSESS THE EXPERTISE AND ORGANISATIONAL FIT OF A TRAINER

                        Once the decision has been taken to hire a trainer, regardless of whether internally or
                        externally, you still have to choose the right person. The following is a list of important
                        selection criteria of what to look for in a trainer: specialist in the desired training area
                        (e.g. management training); appropriate educational background (e.g. work experience
                        and organisational psychologist); management expertise (it lends the trainer credibility in
                        the eyes of the participants if he/she has gathered experience as a manager); personality
                        (extroverted, motivating for others, etc.); communication style (e.g., is his/her commu-
                        nication style suitable for the participants or is the trainer too intellectual, too technical,
                        too esoteric, etc.). It is always useful to check the way trainers work. It is advisable
                        to ask for previous training evaluation forms, participant feedback and references from
                        former clients. You might also consider discussing a trainer’s methods and training style
                        directly with him/her during the selection process.


                        DEFINING RESPONSIBILITIES AND GUIDELINES FOR TRAINERS

                        The next step is to define the responsibilities of both the organisation and the trainer. Is
                        it important that the trainer works out the training concept, or is he/she only responsible
                        for running a training course that has already been developed? Is he/she responsible for
                        the logistical aspects of the course, e.g. organisation, invitations, etc.? Do both agree
                        about evaluation procedures, e.g. participant feedback after each training module?
                          The following example illustrates the decision-making process that was used to select
                        the right trainer for the firm’s introductory-level leadership training programme.

                             INTRODUCTORY-LEVEL LEADERSHIP TRAINING:
                             HOW TO SELECT THE RIGHT TRAINER

                             The firm decided on a training concept which emphasised two main areas: the training
                             of social skills, and the familiarising of managers with important theoretical concepts of
                             leadership behaviour. It was also considered vital to instruct managers in accordance with
                             the firm’s own management principles, whereby each managerial decision should dove-tail
                             with the underlying strategy of the organisation as a whole. With these criteria in mind
                             the training department sought to engage two trainers who matched the following profiles:
                             The first, was to be an expert in leadership training, a specialist in the training of social
                             skills and he/she was also expected to have a strong background in psychology. The second
                             person was to act as a co-trainer, and the firm specifically wanted an experienced manager
                             who would be able to share his/her experiences and recipes for successful management
                             behaviour with the participants and who could help solve concrete problems.
                               For many managers the co-trainer role was to become an important aspect of their
                             own management development. They were given the chance to broaden their skills through
                             the training and development of others and they learned a lot about group dynamics by
                             assuming an active role in the training process. A train-the-trainer preparation course was
                             also made available to managers before the start of the training programme.
                               In this example, the firm’s internal training and development department developed the
                             training programme in conjunction with newly appointed and more experienced managers.
                             The organisation wanted to be certain that the content of the programme was in keeping with
   293   294   295   296   297   298   299   300   301   302   303