Page 341 - How America's Best Places to Work Inspire Extra Effort in Extraordinary Times
P. 341

328B    RE-ENGAGE

        “20-70-10” tiered-performer model that is based on evidence that top
        performers produce disproportionate value and should be rewarded dis-
        proportionately. Some disparage this system as “rank and yank,” forcing
        managers to cut muscle instead of fat after the initial rounds of elimi-
        nating bottom-tier performers, thus risking demoralizing the workforce
        and inviting lawsuits. Others argue that too much differentiation can
        destroy teamwork by reinforcing “we-they” distinctions and can lead
        to overlooking individuals in frontline, customer-facing positions who
        may be the real heroes in the organization. Our own view is that better
        employers achieve differentiation while still valuing all employees.
           Recall our observations in Chapter 2 that Best-Places-to-Work win-
        ners were able to maintain significantly higher engagement scores at all
        position levels “from the mailroom to the boardroom” than were the
        nonwinners. Based on our discussions with representatives of many of
        these winning companies and our analysis of survey comments, the
        truly elite employers have managed to be successful at targeting and
        investing in key high-value talent while also creating a culture that
        consistently values every employee.
           Another word of caution to senior leaders: in discussions centered
        on determining which employees are most critical to the company’s
        strategy, not all members of the senior team may agree about which
        employees actually bring the most value and are most critical. As we
        know, engineering executives may believe engineers that do great
        technical work are the key to business success, while those with busi-
        ness development responsibilities may see things very differently.





        :   ENGAGEMENT PLANNING AND YOUR EMPLOYER BRAND


        As the job market and recruiting challenges become more competi-
        tive, employers naturally become more concerned about how they are
        perceived by the outside world in general and by potential recruits in
        particular. In past years some employers have tried to address this
        concern by simply creating recruitment advertising or Web pages pre-
   336   337   338   339   340   341   342   343   344   345   346