Page 235 - Refining Biomass Residues for Sustainable Energy and Bioproducts
P. 235

Assessment of crude glycerol utilization for sustainable development of biorefineries  205


              Almena and Martı ´n (2015) stated that epichlorohydrin formation consists of four
           stages: purification of crude glycerol, its reaction to mono and dichlorohydrins and
           their separation, epichlorohydrin production, and final product purification. On
           using the process integrated MATLAB 10% higher yield (80.5% vs 73% related to
           the mass of pure glycerol fed to the plant) was achieved in the proposed current
           industrial process. Lari et al. (2018) stated in his study that solid and recyclable
           base can be used as an alternative source to alkali hydroxide catalyst for the epi-
           chlorohydrin production from dehydrochlorination of glycerol. The optimization of
           space velocity and controlling the temperature below 423K enable the yield as high
           as 60%. In the established technologies the production of epichlorohydrin by using
           a heterogeneous catalyst such as heteropolyacid at 110 C and 5 bar pressure in 5 h

           reaction time could convert 49.7% of dihydrochloride (Lee et al., 2008).
           Comparably, Song et al. (2010) achieved 50.9% of epichlorohydrin from dihy-
           drochloride in the presence of a heteropolyacid catalyst in a solid phase gas reactor

           at 250 C.
           9.4.2.3 Triacetin
           Triacetin is also known as 1,2,3-triacetoypropane or glycerin triacetate. It is the
           ester of glycerol that forms with acetic acid. Triacetin can be produced through the
           acid-catalyzed reaction of acetic acid or acetic anhydride with glycerol. Triacetin
           finds its application in pharmaceutical, cosmetic, and fuel additives as an anti-
           knocking agent to minimize the engine knocking. It is used in biofuel to increase in
           cetane number and to decrease the nitrogen oxide emission (Melero et al., 2007).
              Zhu et al. (2013) proposed silver-exchanged phosphotungstic acid (AgPW) cata-
           lysts for glycerol acetylation with acetic acid. Partially, silver-exchanged phospho-
           tungstic acid (Ag1PW) showed high activity and good performance in the reaction.

           The conversion of glycerol is 96.8% at 120 C within 15 min of reaction time. The
           reason is that Ag1PW shows remarkable stability, unique kegging structure, high
           acidity, and excellent water-tolerance property. The selectivity of acetylated pro-
           ducts is 5.2% for triacetin, 46.4% for diacetin, and 48.4% for monoacetin. Mufrodi
           et al. (2012) stated that the crude glycerol and acetic acid in the presence of the sul-
           furic acid catalyst at the temperature of 111 C on the reaction time 90 min yields

           selectivity of triacetin 77.84%. In the exothermic reaction the production of triace-
           tin increases with increase in reaction temperature since acetic acid starts to evapo-
           rate when the temperature is decreased. Sun et al. (2016) investigated that the use
           of magnetic solid acid catalyst for efficient conversion of glycerol to triacetin with
                                                                  22
           acetic anhydride. Stannic chloride pentahydrate Fe Sn Ti (SO ) catalyst aids
                                                                  4
           100% conversion of glycerol and 99% selectivity of triacetin under an optimized
           temperature of 80 C and reaction time 30 min.

           9.4.3 Alternate uses

           The crude glycerol, as a major byproduct during biodiesel production, consists of a
           copious amount of impurities which inhibits its direct usage in industries. However,
   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240