Page 561 - Refining Biomass Residues for Sustainable Energy and Bioproducts
P. 561

Comparative life-cycle analysis of                          23


           synthetic detergents and
           biosurfactants—an overview


                                                            3
                        1
           Sharrel Rebello , A.N Anoopkumar 1,2 , Raveendran Sindhu ,
                                           4
                             3
           Parameswaran Binod , Ashok Pandey and Embalil Mathachan Aneesh 1
           1
            Communicable Disease Research Laboratory, St Joseph’s College, Irinjalakuda, India,
           2
            Department of Zoology, Christ College, University of Calicut, Irinjalakuda, India,
           3
            Microbial Processes and Technology Division, CSIR-National Institute of Interdisciplinary
                                                      4
           Science and Technology (CSIR-NIIST), Trivandrum, India, Centre for Innovation and
           Translational Research, CSIR-Indian Institute of Toxicology Research (CSIR-IITR),
           Lucknow, India


           23.1    Introduction

           The realm of surfactants has marked its presence in every aspect of human life right
           from household, cosmetics, chemical industries, agriculture, biotechnology, petro-
           chemicals, pharmaceuticals, etc. (Rebello et al., 2014; Rodrigues et al., 2006).
           Their range of utility extended from the soft hygiene-oriented toothpastes and soaps
           to harsh and toxic pesticides with a myriad of varieties, brands, and activity levels.
           As per statistical reports, the surfactant market is expected to reach a targeted
           economy of $44.9 billion by 2022 (https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/
           the-global-surfactant-chemical-and-material-market-should-reach-449-billion-by-
           2022300580229.html).
              Irrespective of its wide utility in human life, surfactants have also gained more
           attention on the impacts it leaves off during synthesis, use, and its disposal. A critical
           analysis of published reports indicates that surfactants have greatly depleted and
           harmed the macro as well as microbiota of the aquatic and terrestrial environment
           (Rebello et al., 2014; Susmi et al., 2010; Cserhati et al., 2002; Azizullah et al., 2012).
           The high level of toxicity of surfactants is always associated with its unwise disposal
           to adjoining water bodies, thereby ascertain the need of pretreatment of surfactant
           effluents before their disposal (Ivankovi´ cand Hrenovi´ c, 2010; Bandala et al., 2008).
           Apart from the environment, humans are also seriously affected by the aftermaths of
           surfactant pollution (Enomoto et al., 2007; Hrabak et al., 1982); but they are often
           unaware of the hidden consequences due to ignorance or anesthetic agents that mask
           the exact level of impacts (Azizullah et al., 2012; Vian et al., 1995).
              The complexity and disposal strategy of each kind of surfactant varies and
           depends on its exact chemistry (Pletnev et al., 2001). In such a scenario of toxicity

           Refining Biomass Residues for Sustainable Energy and Bioproducts. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-818996-2.00023-5
           © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
   556   557   558   559   560   561   562   563   564   565   566