Page 104 - Reliability and Maintainability of In service Pipelines
P. 104

Methods for Structural Reliability Analysis 93


             To calculate the probability of failure, they used the level II FOSM reliability
           method. This method requires an iterative solution, when the random variables
           are not normally distributed and the limit state function is nonlinear.
             They developed their model in further studies (Ahammed and Melchers, 1997)
           by considering the effect of following longitudinal stresses:

             Longitudinal tensile stresses as a result of Poisson’s ratio effect from the out-
             ward radial action of the internal fluid pressure.
             Longitudinal thermal stresses.
             Longitudinal stresses due to bending as a result of unevenness or settlement of
             the pipeline bedding.
             Camarinopoulos et al. (1999) used a combination of approximate quadrature
           analytical and Monte Carlo method to evaluate the multiple integrals in their reli-
           ability analysis for cast iron buried water pipes. They also used the model to
           assess the sensitivity of structural reliability to the variation of some important
           parameters such as wall thickness, unsupported length, and external corrosion
           coefficient.
             Yves and Patrick (2000) also presented a method to calculate the reliability of
           the buried water pipes using maintenance records and the Weibull distribution for
           underlying variables. The method appears to rely entirely on the historical data,
           which in most cases is unknown.
             Benmansour and Mrabet (2002) studied the reliability of buried concrete sew-
           ers by using the FOSM method. They studied two typical cases to assess the
           effect of loads on the circumferential and longitudinal behavior of pipes.
           Therefore two limit state functions that they considered in their study were based
           on longitudinal cracking and circular cracking due to bending moments. They did
           not consider corrosion as a deterioration process, therefore their methodology was
           a simple time-independent method.
             Sinha and Pandey (2002) developed a model to estimate the failure probability
           of aging pipelines prone to corrosion by using simulation-based probabilistic neu-
           ral network analysis. The approximations in their neural network model can be
           considered as a limitation of their methodology.
             Sadiq et al. (2004) used Monte Carlo simulations to perform the reliability
           analysis of CI water mains, considering axial and hoop stresses as acting loads in
           a limit state function. The reduction in the factor of safety (FOS) of water mains
           over time was computed, with a failure defined as a situation in which FOS
           becomes smaller than one. The Monte Carlo simulations yielded an empirical
           probability density function of time to failure, to which a lognormal distribution
           was fitted leading to the derivation of a failure hazard function.
             Davis et al. (2005) used Weibull probability distribution to account for varia-
           tion in the degradation rate of asbestos cement sewers. A tensile failure model
   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109