Page 69 - Reliability and Maintainability of In service Pipelines
P. 69

58 Reliability and Maintainability of In-Service Pipelines


              Wall thrust: Wall thrust failure is an ultimate structural failure with a limit
           state function presented in Eq. (2.15).
                                  GT a ; T cr ; tð  Þ 5 T a tðÞ 2 T cr   ð2:15Þ
              The pipe capacity can be calculated using the following equation (Gabriel,
           2011):
                                                  Þϕ
                                     T a 5 F y W t 2 Δð                  ð2:16Þ
              The threshold can be calculated from:

                                                      D o
                                 T cr 5 1:31:67P s C L 1 P W Þ           ð2:17Þ
                                        ð
                                                       2
              Fracture toughness: For localized stress concentration caused by defects, e.g.,
           corrosion pits, a term stress intensity factor, K I , is used in fracture mechanics to
           more accurately predict the stress state (“stress intensity”) near the tip of a crack
           (caused by applied or residual stresses). It is a parameter that amplifies the effect
           of stress field at the tips of crack leading to fracture. In essence, K I serves as a
           scale factor to define the magnitude of the crack-tip stress field and is related to
           the geometrical parameters and stress types of the element (Hertzberg, 1996).
              In general, there are three deformation modes of fracture (Hertzberg, 1996):
           (1) opening mode (Mode I); (2) in-plane shear mode (Mode II); and (3) out-of-
           plane shear or tear mode (Mode III). Since Mode I is found to be the dominant
           cracking condition in pipes under normal service conditions (Laham, 1999), most
           of the time, only Mode I is considered in the failure analysis of the pipe (i.e., a
           crack plane is perpendicular to the direction of the stress incurred).
              If K IC is the critical stress intensity factor, known as fracture toughness,
           beyond which the pipe cannot sustain propagation of the crack pit, the two limit
           state functions for fracture toughness can be established as follows (Mahmoodian,
           2013):

                        For axial fracture:G K IC ; K I2h ; tð  Þ 5 K IC 2 K I2h ðtÞ  ð2:18Þ
                        For hoop fracture:G K IC ; K I2a ; tð  Þ 5 K IC 2 K I2a ðtÞ  ð2:19Þ
              In Eqs. (2.18) and (2.19) it is assumed that fracture toughness of the pipe
           material is the same for both hoop and axial directions.
              Laham (1999) presented a formula for stress intensity factor for a crack pit in
           a pipe under hoop stress as follows:

                                           3
                                      p ffiffiffiffiffiffi X  a 2c R
                               K I2h 5  πa   σ i f i  ;  ;               ð2:20Þ
                                                 d a d
                                          i50
   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74