Page 273 - Religion in the Media Age Media, Religion & Culture
P. 273

262  Public religious culture post-09/11/01

              she does like and watch regularly is Queer Eye for the Straight Guy, where
              five gay men perform a “makeover” on a straight man, including clothing,
              personal grooming, and general living arrangements and lifestyle. The
              Interviewer asks:

              Interviewer: Okay. How do you reconcile Queer Eye for the Straight Guy
                 and your Catholicism?
              Doreen: Oh, I have a hard time with this. You know we all have Catholic
                 guilt and I’m a . . . not like a fallen-away Catholic. I’m not shaken in
                 my faith by the priests and their little go-arounds with young boys and
                 I think they should be punished and the Church was wrong in hiding
                 it. My actual Catholic faith has kept me going. My God, look at all
                 I’ve been through with the kids I had, my heart, my cancer. So my
                 Catholic faith is the foothold of my life. I’m not too sure, though. Boy,
                 this is hard. Homosexuality is a hard thing for me because in my
                 professional life I’ve known several homosexuals and in my personal
                 life. And I have never met one that has been offensive, abusive to me,
                 ummm . . . anything but up and up. None of the ones I know have
                 ever tried to hide it and they have all been very good people doing all
                 very good things in their lives. Now, I know there are some really
                 pathetic queers around but fine, there are pathetic human beings who
                 are straight people. So, I have a hard time for the homosexuals I know,
                 I have a hard time believing that God will condemn them to Hell and
                 so . . . I have to put that.... There are several points in my life that I
                 have to put into a little pocket somewhere and not try to justify it
                 because I can’t. But I just don’t feel that I should, I don’t know, gays
                 don’t bother me. They never have.

              On one level, this is an intriguing demonstration of how social change
              occurs. The gradual connection Doreen has had with gay co-workers and
              others in her own life has begun to erode some of the suspicions she may
              once have held. It also demonstrates how the interview moment often
              brings people to articulations of senses of themselves and their place in the
              web of social relations that may be new or evolving. She clearly struggles
              with received preconceptions (derived both from social and religious
              contexts) about acceptance of homosexuality, and at the same time realizes
              the ways that such conceptions run up against what may be a more basic
              value – that of acceptance and tolerance.
                On another level, it shows how the media do function to express (and
              perhaps enforce) trends and values in the larger culture. Doreen’s
              expressed ideas about homosexuality may derive in some measure from
              her direct and personal experience, but Queer Eye may provide her with a
              broader context and more to think about. Alongside the more formal
              contexts of discourse about gay rights, such as in the political sphere, her
   268   269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   278