Page 276 - Religion in the Media Age Media, Religion & Culture
P. 276

Conclusion: what is produced?  265

            media and religion in the material spheres of cultural and social life. It has
            been my argument that, to do so, we must look at things very concretely
            and directly in the social sphere. Fortunately, a set of methods of social and
            cultural analysis is available that has aided us in our inquiries. As we begin
            to assess what we have found, we will discover that our findings are more
            directly relevant to some questions than they are to others. Meanings,
            consequences, or effects in the social spheres where we have been looking
            will of course be the most directly implicated by what we have found. That
            does not prevent us, though, from informed speculation about other
            spheres as well. What follows, then, is a discussion of what we have seen
            and heard in our inquiries. Some of what we will say directly addresses
            issues and concerns that we considered as part of the justification for this
            study. Other things – and they are some of the most provocative and
            intriguing things we’ve found – emerge from the study itself.


            The ubiquity of media
            Across all the interviews and observations, from a variety of contexts and
            perspectives (social, religious, ethnic, and otherwise), no other single thing
            seems so universal as the sense of the ubiquity, pervasiveness, or inescapa-
            bility of the media. From household to household and interview to
            interview, all share in common an assumption – even an expectation – that
            the media are universal and “taken for granted.” They are the  lingua
            franca and the common ground of contemporary social and cultural expe-
            rience and practice. Numerous previous studies have arrived at the same
            conclusion, showing, among other things, that the media condition the
            structuration and tempo of daily life, and the norms, languages, and
            contexts of social and cultural discourse.
              The pervasiveness of media is, further, something that is often reflex-
            ively engaged in the accounts we have seen. For an example, in Chapter 7
            Jan Van Gelder lamented the power and pressure that the media seem to
            exert on her home life, in spite of hers being a family that has taken
            concrete steps to limit their role. Across our interviews, parents have felt
            this pervasiveness and ubiquity most keenly. The media, including televi-
            sion, film, popular music, and – increasingly – personal media and
            hand-held devices, are at the center of youth culture today, and their influ-
            ence seems to stretch across a range of social domains, from the
            structuring of time, to the provision of common cultural idioms and the
            topics of conversation through which broader social discourse takes place.
              What is most significant to our explorations here is that the media are
            also pervasive in the homes of those who – for religious or other reasons –
            we might have expected to exercise the most “control” over them. In fact,
            in such homes (the Millikens in Chapter 6, for example) what is distinct is
            their sense that they have to do something about the media, not the fact of
   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281