Page 131 -
P. 131

5.5  Nonprobabilistic sampling  117





                   Theoretically, it might be possible to do a random sampling of current screen
                   reader users (people who are blind or low vision and are already using a screen
                   reader). However, to do so would require the major screen reader companies
                   (companies such as Freedom Scientific, AI Squared, and Apple) to collaborate,
                   share sales data, and any data that they have on users, to come up with a list
                   of current screen reader users which probabilistic sampling methods could be
                   applied to. Because the screen reader market is highly competitive, there have
                   been lawsuits over intellectual property infringement, and there are a number
                   of partnerships in place (e.g., AI Squared partnered with Microsoft to allow
                   users of Microsoft Office to download free versions of the Window-Eyes screen
                   reader), the likelihood of these companies collaborating on research and sharing
                   data is not very high. Because companies want the Screen Reader Survey to
                   report favorably on their market share, there can be pressure to “get out the
                   vote.” While the Screen Reader Survey has a fair number of methodological
                   flaws, it is the best set of data out there, over a 6-year period, about screen
                   reader usage. For more information about the most recent Screen Reader
                   Survey, see http://webaim.org/projects/screenreadersurvey6/. Chris Hofstader
                   provides an in-depth criticism of the methodology of the screen reader survey at
                   http://chrishofstader.com/screen-reader-market-figures-my-analysis-of-webaim-
                   survey-6/. The inherent conflict between the need for the data and the wish for
                   highly valid data when none is available can be seen in Chris's comment that
                   “I love numbers and, while the WebAIM survey has some major flaws, it is by
                   far the best data we have available to us regarding the questions it covers” right
                   before he provides pages and pages of criticism. ☺


                     Finally, it is important to note that self-selected, nonprobability-based surveys
                  may be the most natural data collection method for investigating new user popula-
                  tions or new phenomena of usage. For instance, if no data exists about a certain user
                  population or usage pattern, then a self-selected survey of users, asking about usage,
                  might make the most sense, just as a starting point. The population of interest can be
                  informed about the survey by posting a message about the survey to a social network-
                  ing group, listserver, or chat room where members of the population are known to
                  congregate (Schmidt, 1997).

                  5.5.5   UNINVESTIGATED POPULATIONS

                  Surprisingly, there are user groups that have still not been investigated in much de-
                  tail. For instance, people with certain types of cognitive impairments have yet to
                  receive much attention, if any, in the HCI research literature (see Chapter 16). For
                  these populations where no baseline data exists, not enough is already known to
                  develop hypotheses, experimental design, or well-structured time diaries. Population
                  estimates may exist on how many people are living with a certain impairment within
                  a certain country; however, no data exists on how many individuals with a certain
   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136