Page 268 - Reservoir Formation Damage
P. 268

248    Reservoir Formation  Damage

                deposit  over  the  similar  wettability  type  pore  surfaces.  They  can  also
                be  captured  at  and  detained  behind  the  pore  throats  under  favorable
                conditions.  The  intermediately  wet  particles  most  likely  move  directly
                towards  the  pore  throats  and  are  captured there  under certain conditions,
                because  they  migrate  along  the  interface.

                Surface  Deposition

                  The  volumetric  rate  of  deposition  of  the  particle  species j  from  phase
                J  over  a  similar  wetting pore  surface can be  expressed  by  (Civan,  1996):


                       =  d      =  k djjjs(a.j                           (11-33)

                subject  to  the  initial  condition


                   -jJS                                                   (11-34)

                In  Eq.  11-33,  k djjjs  is  a  deposition  rate  constant,  a y  is  a  stationary
                deposition  constant,  0  is  a  porosity,  and  f js  is  the  fraction  of  the  pore
                surface  of  the  same  wettability type  of  the  particle  species  j.
                  Similar  to  Gruesbeck  and  Collins  (1982),  Liu  and  Civan (1996)  assumed
                that  the  porosity  variation  by  deposition  of  small  amounts of  particles  is
                negligible  (i.e.,  (|)  is  a  constant).  Liu  and  Civan  (1996)  considered  a
                homogeneous  wettability  porous  media,  hence  f js  = 1,  and  neglected  the
                stationary  deposition,  therefore  oc y =0.


                Pore  Throat  Plugging

                  The  volumetric rate  of retention  of particles  in  the pore  space following
                the  pore  throat  plugging  can  be  expressed  by  (Gruesbeck  and  Collins,
                1982,  Civan,  1996):

                       =  d                                               (11-35)


                subject  to  the  initial  condition

                                                                          (11-36)

                  Liu  and  Civan  (1996)  assumed  the  porosity  change  is  negligible  in
                Eq.  11-35 (i.e.,  (})  =  constant).  In  Eq.  11-35,  k tiJtS  denotes  the  rate
   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273