Page 239 - Reservoir Geomechanics
P. 239

220    Reservoir geomechanics


              Can hydraulic fracturing be used to estimate the magnitude of S   Hmax ?


              Following the work of Hubbert and Willis (1957), Haimson and Fairhurst (1970) pro-
              posed open-hole hydraulic fracturing in vertical wellbores as a technique for determina-
              tion of the orientation and magnitude of S Hmax . While a number of minor modifications
              have been made to the techniques they proposed over the years, suffice it to say that
              many successful stress measurements have been made around the world using the basic
              technique they proposed over 30 years ago. Amadei and Stephansson (1997)offer a
              fairly comprehensive review of the experimental techniques and analytical procedures
              associated with using the hydraulic fracturing technique for in situ stress measurements.
                We briefly review here the classical use of hydraulic fracturing for determination of
              the magnitude of S Hmax .However, because these techniques are best suited for relatively
              shallow holes where both stress and temperatures are low (generally about 2 km, or less)
              and relatively strong rocks (so that breakouts are not present), this technique has very
              limitedapplicationinthepetroleumindustry.Infact,wewillconcludethissectionwitha
              briefsummaryofthereasonswhyclassicalhydraulicfracturingisnotparticularlyuseful
              for determining the magnitude of S Hmax in the oil and gas (or geothermal) industries.
                Following the discussions in Chapter 6,at the point of minimum compression around
              the wellbore (i.e. at θ = 0, parallel to S Hmax ), a hydraulic fracture will be induced when
              σ  min  =−T 0 = 3S hmin − S Hmax − 2P p − 
P − σ  
T                (7.1)
               θθ
              Ignoring σ 
T ,a tensile fracture will form at the wellbore wall when

                                                                                  (7.2)
               P b = 3S hmin − S Hmax − P p + T 0
              where P b is called the breakdown pressure, similar to the FBP (formation breakdown
              pressure) referred to in Figure 7.2. Assuming that S hmin is measured from the pumping
              pressure (FPP) or shut-in pressure (ISIP), and that P 0 and T 0 have either been measured
              or estimated,

              S Hmax = 3S hmin − P b − P p + T 0                                  (7.3)
                Bredehoeft, Wolf et al. (1976) pointed out that to avoid the problem of determining
              T 0 ,a secondary pressurization cycle can be used (i.e after a hydraulic fracture is initiated
              at the wellbore wall), and this reduces to

              S Hmax = 3S hmin − P b (T = 0) − P p                                (7.4)
              where P b (T = 0) indicates the breakdown pressure after an initial hydrofrac has been
              created at the wellbore wall.
                Numerous papers have been written that both use this basic technique for measure-
              ment of S Hmax or propose modifications to result in improvements. Two compilations of
              papers related to hydrofrac stress measurements summarize much of the relevant expe-
              rience (Zoback and Haimson 1983; Haimson 1989). Most of the successful application
   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244