Page 31 - Reservoir Geomechanics
P. 31

16     Reservoir geomechanics


               Indicators of contemporary stress orientation and relative magnitude


               Zoback and Zoback (1980) showed that a variety of different types of stress-related
               data could be used to produce comprehensive maps of stress orientation and relative
               magnitude at regional scales. A stress measurement quality criterion for different types
               of stress indicators was later proposed by Zoback and Zoback (1989, 1991) which is
               discussed in detail in Chapter 6.A key decision that Mary Lou Zoback and I made
               in these initial compilations was to consider only stress data from depths greater than
               several hundred meters. This was to avoid a myriad of non-tectonic, surface-related
               sources of stress (due, for example, to topography, thermal effects and weathering) from
               having a large effect where tectonic stresses are small (see Zoback and Zoback 1991).
               The success of our initial stress mapping efforts demonstrated that with careful attention
               to data quality, coherent stress patterns over large regions of the earth can be mapped
               with reliability and interpreted with respect to large scale geological processes. The
               Zoback and Zoback criterion was subsequently utilized in the International Lithosphere
               Program’s World Stress Map Project, a large collaborative effort of data compilation
               and analyses by scientists from 30 different countries led by Mary Lou Zoback (Zoback
               1992). Today, the World Stress Map (WSM) database has almost 10,000 entries and
               is maintained at the Heidelberg Academy of Sciences and the Geophysical Institute of
               Karlsruhe University, Germany (http://www-wsm.physik.uni-karlsruhe.de/).
                 The following provides a brief description of stress indicators described in the stress
               compilationspresentedthroughoutthisbook.AsindicatedinTable1.2,thesetechniques
               are discussed in detail in subsequent chapters.



               Wellbore stress measurements

               The most classic stress measurement technique used in wellbores at depth is the
               hydraulic fracturing technique (Haimson and Fairhurst 1970). When a well or bore-
               hole is drilled, the stresses that were previously supported by the exhumed material
               are transferred to the region surrounding the well. The resultant stress concentration is
               well understood in terms of elastic theory, and amplifies the stress difference between
               far-field principal stresses by a factor of 4 (see Chapter 6). Under ideal circumstances,
               recording the trace of a hydraulic fracture on a wellbore wall can be used to determine
               stress orientation. However, such measurements are usually limited to hard rock sites
               and relatively shallow depths (<3 km) where open-hole hydraulic fracturing is possi-
               ble. In most oil and gas wells, hydraulic fracturing cannot be used to determine stress
               orientation because the wells must be cased in order to carry out hydraulic fracturing
               without endangering the downhole equipment and wellbore. As discussed in Chapter 6,
               hydraulic fracturing enables the least principal stress magnitude to be determined with
               some accuracy (Zoback and Haimson 1982).
   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36