Page 53 - Separation process principles 2
P. 53

18  Chapter 1  Separation Processes
                                                                                                                       i
                                                                                                                       !
               Table 1.5  Operating Material Balance for Hydrocarbon Recovery Process
                                                                 lbmolh in Stream

                                 1             2            3            4           5            6           7
               Component      Feed to C 1   C5+-rich     Feed to C2     c3        Feed to C3     iC4        nC4-rich










               c6+
               Total


               Table 1.6  Split Fractions and Split Ratios for Hydrocarbon Recovery Process

                                    Column 1                  Column 2                 Column 3             Overall
                                                                                                            Percent
               Component        SF          SR            SF           SR          SF           SR         Recovery
               C2H6           1 .OO       Large          1 .OO       Large         -            -           100
               C3Hs           1 .OO       Large          0.9614      24.91         1  .OO     Large          96.14
               iC4H1o         0.9994      1,717          0.0035       0.0035      0.9497      18.90          94.59
               nC4H1o         0.9969       323.7         0.00         0.00        0.0477       0.0501        94.94
               iC5H12         0.7025         2.361       0.00         0.00        0.00         0.00          29.75

               C6+            0.00        Small          -            -            -           -            100




               97.86%, while the iC4 overhead purity is (162.50/175.50) or   These values, as computed from the data of Table 1.5, are
               92.59% iC4. The nC4-rich bottoms from Column 3 has an   listed in the last column of Table I .6. As shown, the compo-
              nC4 purity of only (215.80/270.00) or 79.93%. Each of the   nent recoveries are all relatively high (>95%) except for the
               three columns is designed to make a split between two adja-   two pentane isomers. The other measure of extent of separa-
               cent components (called the key  components) in the list of   tion is productpurity. These purities for the main component
               components ordered in decreasing volatility. As seen by the   were computed for all except the C5+-rich product, which is
               horizontal dividing lines in Table  1.6, the three key  splits   [(11.90 + 16.10 + 205.30)/234.10] or 99.66% pure with re-
               are  nC4Hlo/iCsH12, C3Hs/iC4Hl0, and  iC4Hlo/nC4Hlo for   spect to the pentanes and heavier. Such a product is a multi-
               Columns 1, 2, and 3, respectively. From the split fractions   component product. One of the most common multicompo-
               listed in Table 1.6, it is seen that all splits are relatively sharp   nent products is gasoline.
               (SF > 0.95 for the light key  and  SF < 0.05 for the heavy   Product impurity levels and a designation of the impuri-
              key), except for column 1, where the split ratio for the heavy   ties are included in product specifications for chemicals of
              key  (iC5HI2) is not sharp at all, and ultimately causes the   commerce. The product purity with respect to each compo-
              nC4-rich bottoms to be relatively impure in nC4, even though   nent in each of the three final products for the hydrocarbon
              the split between the two key  components in the third col-   recovery process, as computed from the process operating
              umn is relatively sharp.                            data of Table 1.5, is given in Table 1.7, where the values are
                 InTable 1.6, for each column, values of SF and SR decrease   also  extremely  important  because  maximum  allowable
              in the order of the ranked component list. It is also noted in   percentages of impurities are compared to the product spec-
              Table  1.6 that  SF may  be  a better quantitative measure of   ifications. The C5+ fraction is not included because it is an
              degree of separation than SR because SF is bounded between   internlediate that is sent to an isomerization process. From
              0 and 1, while SR can range from 0 to a very large value.   the comparison in Table 1.7, it is seen that two products eas-
                 Two other common measures of extent of separation can   ily meet their specifications, while the  iC4 product barely
              be applied to each column, or to the separation system as a   meets its specification. If the process is equipped with effec-
              whole. One measure is the percent recovery in a designated   tive controllers, it might be possible to  reduce the energy
              system product of each component in the feed to the system.   input to the process and still meet C3 and nC4-rich product
   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58