Page 109 - Harnessing the Strengths
P. 109

92  ■  Servant-Leadership in the Intercultural Practice



         tive. If you are adept at both approaches, you can use either
         at will.
              In this specific dilemma different qualities and charac-

         teristics of the servant-leader play a role, which are closely
         related to the general concepts we dealt with in Chapter 1.
         The essential qualities of a servant-leader comprise the ability
         to facilitate a process that allows creative individuals to serve
         the team in order to jointly reach higher productivity. Con-
         versely, the servant-leader can also ensure that the team feels
         and takes responsibility to serve the individual as the foun-
         dation of the whole. Naturally, in individualistic cultures
         the servant-leader will have the preference to begin with the
         creative individuals and encourage them to share the fruits
         of their endeavors for the collective. In more group-oriented
         cultures the servant-leader will rather spend that energy
         stimulating the team to encourage individual creativity. And
         thus, servant-leadership works in, and between, each and all
         cultures.

            Resolution
            Back to Peter Webber’s reality: What should he do with
            the reward system at Cloverpill? How can he encourage
            the Moroccans, Americans, Japanese, and Dutch to work
            constructively together? One good option could be to give
            50 percent of the variable reward to the individual, based
            on the contribution to the team as a team player. The other
            50 percent could go to the teams that have successfully
            demonstrated their commitment to increasing individual
            creativity.
                The reward system for the marketing staff and sales-
            people could be based on what the sellers have learned
            from their clients, as a form of co-opetition, much like in
   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114