Page 183 - Silence in Intercultural Communication
P. 183

170  Silence in Intercultural Communication



             (61)   [Interview: Dr. Lucas]
                     [...] I keep on assessing through their interest, through their eyes, whether or
                     not I’m talking too much, so that’s okay. But I do try and question as well
                     although sometimes that doesn’t work quite well because they get a bit
                     frightened.

             If one of Dr. Lucas’ strategies to assess student engagement with the subject was
             non-verbal communication with “their eyes,” Aya’s frequent lowering of eye-gaze
             around key open questions would negatively affect this assessment.
                Dr. Lucas also mentioned in the interview that he did not see Aya as a student
             “asserting a strong personality” or “projecting a mature and confident image.” In-
             stead, he found hesitancy in her communication. In contrast, the student, Henry,
             was positively evaluated by Dr. Lucas as being “excited, engaged” with “genuine
             passion for issues,” and showing “personal interest” in the subject. Henry was
             also often observed maintaining his eye-gaze towards Dr. Lucas, which may have
             contributed to the positive image. The contrast between Aya and Henry found in
             their use of eye-gaze, and the perceptions of their attitudes by Dr. Lucas, are simi-
             lar to what Harumi (1999) found. The British students in her study directed their
             eye-gaze towards the teacher during their silences while the Japanese students did
             not, and furthermore, the meaning of Japanese students’ silence not accompa-
             nied by such eye-gaze was found to be unclear, while the British students’ silence
             accompanied by such eye-gaze was found to show a positive attitude to partici-
             pation. The role of non-verbal expressions accompanying silence appears to be
             significant, and requires more extensive, in depth research in the future.
                Returning to the issue of varied perceptions among the students in Dr. Lucas’
             class, Henry expressed an extremely positive attitude towards both the subject
             and Dr. Lucas, as found in his comment below:

             (62)   [Interview: Henry]
                     I found that I’ve learnt a great deal more because of the small tute and the
                     small number of people in there. I find I’ve been really motivated to learn
                     because I can do the readings each week because you’re in small group. … in a
                     big class of 20 people, you can sit back for a week if you don’t do any readings
                     and not say a thing basically. But in a small group, you’ve got a (      ) of really
                     learning a great deal more because of it and it’s really - I think it’s a lot better.
                     It’s good. I really enjoy the class and I like how it’s run. I like how it’s organised
                     and things like that. I think Dr. Lucas is a very good lecturer.

             The “pressure” to perform well and the level of deference towards the lecturer
             expected of students may have been overestimated by Aya. This may have led her
             to communicate on a footing where the ‘correct’ answer was important and the
   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188