Page 168 -
P. 168
8 The Importance of Ontological Structure: Why Validation by ‘Fit-to-Data’... 165
is
0), 0), 0)), model has In for vdata) vector all model < (continued)
1& 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 0, case, being model the typically entries. caters incremented epsilon a is whether vdata.This the of
DD DD model DD model DD model this In setting. setting parameter where cases data: the vdata) ‘DD‘, is data the FALSE of full be usually term ‘noise’ be to BIC accuracy, parameter): y, epsilong < near.enough, ceq likelihood, saying model) to enough) probability all)est.likelihood length(ceq)
matrix(c(sum(ifelse(vdata 0), 1, & 0 DD & 1 DD & 0 DD 2) D parameter given a for the with model the the store to meq as output same 2, apply(model, and model the between normally then would Gaussian the and AIC the in k an allowing alternative, another as counts function(x, < fabs(x-
require(vcd) m< 1, DD model sum(ifelse(vdata sum(ifelse(vdata sum(ifelse(vdata ncol 2, D nrow Kappa(m) outputs of of replication each amatrix Firstwebuild the produced < meq equality Strict meq unrealistic; models, mathematical requires but issue this An accordingly. similarly (which near.enough D eps
the distribution a for column a of is Log to
of comparing of has and for models). parameter data. parameter estimated. easier
degree probability one and probability computations parameters of the to prediction be
the by the stochastic vdata linear the of set fit better likelihood model’s be only can they
measures model the of is model of using as as (such function given a For a maximum the can as distributions
that and estimate an chance the length the vdata computed available algorithms a is data. suggests for of likelihoods reported
statistic data the with by where as in row are R, observed likelihood search distribution known of
a case rows the typically in likelihood function), sometimes case
is between agreement occurring of to and, model-fitting the could the
kappa the for number are the given higher a Unless a (as are the in
Cohen’s agreement observed agreement available same corresponding Likelihoods distributions, specific Essentially, model values, Calibration values. known likelihoods compute
are the with inputs
kappa metrics matrix and
Cohen’s Various a now evaluated Likelihood