Page 172 -

8 The Importance of Ontological Structure: Why Validation by ‘Fit-to-Data’... 169

Devlin, K. (1991). Logic and information. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Do, H.-H., & Rahm, E. (2002, August 20–23) COMA: A system for flexible combination of
schema matching approaches. In VLDB 2002: 28th International Conference on Very Large
Data Bases, Kowloon Shangri-La Hotel, Hong Kong, China. http://www.vldb.org/conf/2002/
S17P03.pdf. Accessed May 2017.
Doan, A., Madhavan, J., Domingos, P., & Halevy, A. (2004). Ontology matching: A machine
learning approach. In S. Staab & R. Studer (Eds.), Handbook on ontologies (pp. 385–403).
Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
Drchal, J., ˇ Certický, M., & Jakob, M. (2016). VALFRAM: Validation framework for activity-
based models. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 19(3), 15. http://
jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/19/3/15.html. Accessed May 2017.
Edmonds, B. (2002, June 3). Simplicity is not truth-indicative. In Centre for policy modelling
discussion papers CPM-02-99. http://cfpm.org/discussionpapers/111/simplicity-is-not-truth-
indicative. Accessed May 2017.
Edmonds, B., & Moss, S. (2005, July 19). From KISS to KIDS: An ‘anti-simplistic’ modelling
approach. In P. Davidsson, B. Logan, & K. Takadama (Eds.), Multi-agent and multi-agent-
based simulation, joint workshop MABS 2004, Revised selected papers. Lecture notes in
artificial intelligence 3415 (pp. 130–114), New York, NY, USA.
Elsenbroich, C. (2012). Explanation in agent-based modelling: Functions, causality or
mechanisms? Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 15(3), 1. http://
jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/15/3/1.html. Accessed May 2017.
Epstein, J. M. (2008). Why model? Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 11(4), 12.
http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/11/4/12.html. Accessed May 2017.
Etienne, M. (2014). Companion modelling: A participatory approach to support sustainable
development. The Netherlands: Springer.
Evans, J. S. B. T., & Over, D. E. (2004). If. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Faria, D., Pesquita, C., Santos, E., Palmonari, M., Cruz, I. F., & Couto, F. M. (2013, September
9–13). The agreementmakerlight ontology matching system. In R. Meersman, H. Panetto, T.
Dillon, J. Eder, Z. Bellahsene, N. Ritter, P. De Leenheer, & D. Dou (Eds.), On themoveto
meaningful internet systems: OTM 2013 conferences. Confederated international conferences
CoopIS, DOA-trusted cloud, and ODBASE 2013, Proceedings. lecture notes in computer
science 8185 (pp. 527–541), , Graz, Austria.
Filatova, T., Polhill, J. G., & van Ewijk, S. (2016). Regime shifts in coupled socio-environmental
systems: Review of modelling challenges and approaches. Environmental Modelling and
Software, 75, 333–347.
Funahashi, K. (1989). On the approximate realisation of continuous mappings by neural networks.
Neural Networks, 2(3), 183–192.
Ge, J., & Polhill, J. G. (2016). Exploring the combined effect of factors influencing commuting
patterns and CO2 emissions in Aberdeen using an agent-based model. Journal of Artificial
Societies and Social Simulation, 19(3), 11. http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/19/3/11.html. Accessed
May 2017.
Giunchiglia, F., Autayeu, A., & Pane, J. (2012). S-match: An open source framework for matching
lightweight ontologies. Semantic Web, 3(3), 307–317.
Gotts, N. M., & Polhill, J. G. (2009, October 5–6). Narrative scenarios, mediating formalisms, and
the agent-based simulation of land use change. In F. Squazzoni (Ed.), Epistemological aspects
of computer simulation in the social sciences. Second international workshop EPOS, Revised
selected and invited papers. Lecture notes in artificial intelligence 5466 (pp. 99–116), Brescia,
Italy.
Gotts, N. M., & Polhill, J. G. (2010). Size matters: Large-scape replications of experiments with
FEARLUS. Advances in Complex Systems, 13(4), 453–467.
Grimm, V., Frank, K., Jeltsch, F., Brandl, R., Uchma´ nski, J., & Wissel, C. (1996). Pattern-oriented
modelling in population ecology. The Science of the Total Environment, 153, 151–166.
Gruber, T. R. (1993). A translation approach to portable ontology specification. Knowledge
Acquisition, 5(2), 199–220.