Page 104 - Six Sigma Demystified
P. 104

Chapter 4  DEF INE STAGE        85


                           helpful to slow the frenzy and ensure that the points of disagreement are clear
                           to all. In this way, misinterpretation can be resolved or minority voices heard.
                           An effective method of doing this is to help the team develop a clear list of
                           advantages and disadvantages for each option. Keep the focus on the specific
                           problem at hand. Help team members to remove opinions and attitudes that
                           cloud or prejudice the issues. At the least, develop a consensus on the points
                           that need to be addressed for the issue to be resolved.
                             When team authority is not recognized, usually by those outside the team,
                           then stakeholders may not have been identified properly. Often team authority
                           is questioned by groups or individuals who feel that they are not represented
                           on the team and refuse to contribute as a result. It may be that they are indeed
                           represented, but they have not been brought up to speed on the team’s mission.
                           These problems can be prevented through proper communication throughout
                           the stakeholder groups. When stakeholders refuse to contribute or actively
                           block progress, sponsors may need to discuss these issues with the individuals
                           outside the team setting.
                             Power struggles also can occur in teams, usually when more senior members
                           of an organization decide to “flex their muscle” or if two groups in the organiza-
                           tion have competing interests. The ground rules, discussed at the initial meet-
                           ing, should be referenced and enforced to prevent escalation of these struggles.
                             Data- driven  consensus- based decision making often undercuts these power
                           struggles. Creating an environment where all members participate prevents
                           certain team members from dominating the discussions.
                             It may sound silly, but too much agreement also may be a bad thing. Conflict
                           can be good. A healthy dose of skepticism may find a problem before it becomes
                           a headache. Respectful differences of opinion can help the brainstorming pro-

                           cess  uncover  new  methods  or  discover  old  problems  that  haven’t  been
                           addressed.
                             In summary, the following issues regarding team development and consensus
                           building should be recognized:

                             •  Projects cannot succeed without a team effort by the affected stake-
                                holders.
                             •  Team members have the responsibility to ensure team performance.
                             •  The team leader must establish and enforce ground rules.

                             •  Buy- in is crucial; consensus builds  buy- in.
                             •  Responsible team management leads to successful project management.
   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109