Page 138 - Six Sigma Demystified
P. 138

Chapter 6  a n a ly z e   S tag e        119


                             The outcomes of movement and space reduction include
                             •  Decreased distance from supplier to customer. Both internal and external
                                suppliers and customers are affected. This relocation reduces the wastes
                                of unnecessary movement and wait time associated with the movement.
                             •  Less departmentalization and more multifunction work cells. Within com-
                                pany walls, you may reassign individuals so that they work within multi-
                                functional  work  cells  rather  than  functional  departments.  In  small
                                companies,  cross- training may eliminate the need for some specialized
                                functions. For example, instead of a  customer- service representative for-
                                warding an order to accounts payable,  customer- service representatives
                                could create and  e- mail a completed invoice to the customer while the
                                customer is still on the phone. This improves the flow of the process
                                (whether a physical product, paperwork, or even ideas) so that work is not
                                batched up at each department. Multifunction work cells reduce the
                                waste of waiting and improve the visibility of slowdowns, barriers, or inef-
                                ficiencies that occur in the preceding or following steps.
                             •  Reduced overhead costs and reduced need for new facilities. As space is used
                                more efficiently, overhead costs are reduced, as is the need for new facili-
                                ties if new equipment or labor is acquired.


                             Level loading, to match the production rates of the process steps, also reduces
                           NVA cycle times. Level loading of serial processes will remove all work in prog-
                           ress. The flow becomes batchless, with a shorter cycle time, increased flexibility,
                           decreased response time, and an increase in the percent of VA activities. “Start
                           an item, finish an item” is the mantra.

                             Batches are not nearly as efficient as they appear from either a systems’ or a
                           customer’s perspective. As ironic as it may seem, a major reason processes con-
                           tain waste is because of historical attempts to drive efficiency. One commonly
                           accepted fallacy is that processes become more efficient by creating specialized
                           departments that process work in batches. These departments become efficient
                           from a process standpoint, with economic lot quantities designed to minimize
                           setup time or material delivery costs, but they lack efficiency relative to specific
                           product value streams. Waste is created in waiting for the batch to begin its
                           departmental processing, and waste is additionally created when particular
                           units of product, for which customers are waiting, must wait for the remainder
                           of the batch to be processed.
                             The attempts to improve the departmental efficiency can create additional
   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143