Page 125 - Socially Intelligent Agents Creating Relationships with Computers and Robots
P. 125

108                                            Socially Intelligent Agents

                             they flexibly transfer autonomy rather than rigidly committing to initial deci-
                             sions, and they may change the coordination rather than taking risky actions in
                             uncertain states. We have implemented our ideas in the E-Elves system using
                             MDPs, and our AA implementation nows plays a central role in the successful
                             24/7 deployment of E-Elves in our group. Its success in the diverse tasks of
                             that domain demonstrates the promise that our framework holds for the wide
                             range of multi-agent domains for which AA is critical.

                             Acknowledgments
                               This research was supported by DARPA award No. F30602-98-2-0108 (Control of Agent-
                             Based Systems) and managed by ARFL/Rome Research Site.

                             References

                              [1] Chalupsky, H., Gil, Y., Knoblock, C. A., Lerman, K., Oh, J., Pynadath, D. V., Russ, T. A.,
                                 and Tambe, M. Electric elves: Applying agent technology to support human organizations.
                                 In Proc. of the IAAI. Conf., 2001.
                              [2] Collins, J., Bilot, C., Gini, M., and Mobasher, B. Mixed-init. dec.-supp. in agent-based
                                 auto. contracting. In Proc. of the Conf. on Auto. Agents, 2000.
                              [3] Dorais, G. A., Bonasso, R. P., Kortenkamp, D., Pell, B., andSchreckenghost, D. Adjustable
                                 autonomy for human-centered autonomous systems on mars. In Proc. of the Intn’l Conf.
                                 of the Mars Soc., 1998.
                              [4] Ferguson, G., Allen, J., and Miller, B. TRAINS-95 : Towards a mixed init. plann. asst. In
                                 Proc. of the Conf. on Art. Intell. Plann. Sys., pp. 70–77.
                              [5] Horvitz, E., Jacobs, A., and Hovel, D. Attention-sensitive alerting. In Proc. of the Conf.
                                 on Uncertainty and Art. Intell., pp. 305–313, 1999.
                              [6] Lesser, V., Atighetchi, M., Benyo, B., Horling, B., Raja, A., Vincent, R., Wagner, T., Xuan,
                                 P., and Zhang, S. X. A multi-agent system for intelligent environment control. In Proc.
                                 of the Conf. on Auto. Agents, 1994.
                              [7] Mitchell, T., Caruana, R., Freitag, D., McDermott, J., and Zabowski, D. Exp. with a
                                 learning personal asst. Comm. of the ACM, 37(7):81–91, 1994.
                              [8] Puterman, M. L. Markov Decision Processes. John Wiley & Sons, 1994.
                              [9] Quinlan, J. R. C4.5: Progs. for Mach. Learn. Morgan Kaufmann, 1993.
                             [10] Scerri, P., Pynadath, D. V., and Tambe, M. Adjustable autonomy in real-world multi-agent
                                 environments. In Proc. of the Conf. on Auto. Agents, 2001.
                             [11] Tambe, M., Pynadath, D. V., Chauvat, N., Das, A., and Kaminka, G. A. Adaptive agent
                                 integration architectures for heterogeneous team members. In Proc. of the Intn’l Conf. on
                                 MultiAgent Sys., pp. 301–308, 2000.
                             [12] Tollmar, K., Sandor, O., and Sch¯ omer, A. Supp. soc. awareness: @Work design & expe-
                                 rience. In Proc. of the ACM Conf. on CSCW, pp. 298–307, 1996.
   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130