Page 288 - Solar Power in Building Design The Engineer's Complete Design Resource
P. 288

PROJECT COST ANALYSIS  255


               numerous charges such as commissioning, decommissioning, bulk purchase, and
               other miscellaneous cost items that generally appear on electric bills (that vary sea-
               sonally) but go unnoticed by consumers.
                  The most significant of the charges, which is in fact a penalty, is classified as
               peak hour energy. This charge occurs when the consumer’s power demand exceeds
               the established boundaries of energy consumption as stipulated in tariff agree-
               ments. In order to maintain a stable power supply and cost for a unit of energy
               (a kilowatt-hour), service distributors, such as Southern California Electric (SCE)
               and other power-generating entities, generally negotiate a long-term agreement
               whereby the providers guarantee distributors a set bulk of energy for a fixed sum.
               Since energy providers have a limited power generation capacity, limits are set as
               to the amount of power that is to be distributed for the duration of the contract. A
               service provider such as SCE uses statistics and demographics of the territories
               served to project power consumption demands, which then form the baseline for
               the energy purchase agreement. When energy consumption exceeds the projected
               demand, it becomes subject to much costlier tariffs, which are generally referred to
               as the peak bulk energy rate.


               Project Cost Analysis



               As indicated in the preliminary solar power cogeneration study, the average installed
               cost per watt of electric energy is approximately $9 as shown in Figure 9.6a to c.
               The unit cost encompasses all turnkey cost components, such as engineering design
               documentation, solar power components, PV support structures, electric hardware,
               inverters, integration labor, and labor force training. Structures in that cost include
               roof-mount support frames and simple carport canopies, only. Special architectural
               monuments if required may necessitate some incremental cost adjustment. As per the
               CEC, all solar power cogeneration program rebate applications applied for before
               December of 2002 were subject to a 50 percent subsidy. At present, rebate allotments
               are strictly dependent on the amount of funding available at the time of application and
               are granted on a first come, first serve basis.


               MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONAL COSTS

               As mentioned earlier, solar power systems have a near-zero maintenance require-
               ment.  This is due to solid-state technology, lamination techniques, and the total
               absence of mechanical or moving parts. However to prevent marginal degradation in
               output performance from dust accumulation, solar arrays require a biyearly rinsing
               with a water hose.
                  Figure 9.6 is a detailed estimate, designed by the author, for a solar power project for
               the Water and Life Museum located in Hemet, California. As discussed in Chapter 3 the
               project consists of two museum campuses with a total of seven buildings, each con-
               structed with roof-mount solar power PV systems.
   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   290   291   292   293