Page 123 - Solid Waste Analysis and Minimization a Systems Approach
P. 123

DEFINE     101



                    6.2 Define




                    The purpose of the define stage is to gather sufficient information to clarify the oppor-
                    tunity for improvement, learn about the process, learn about the organizations barriers to
                    solving the problem, and to develop a plan to address the problem. Common tools that
                    are used throughout the define stage are


                    ■ Listening to customers
                      ■ Kano model
                      ■ Affinity diagram
                      ■ Pareto analysis
                      ■ Surveys
                    ■ Gaining process knowledge
                      ■ Process mapping
                      ■ SIPOC analysis
                      ■ Work studies
                    ■ Sizing the problem
                      ■ Force-field analysis
                      ■ Developing project charter


                      A Kano model (Fig. 6.1) is a tool developed to compare the relationship between cus-
                    tomer satisfaction and customer requirements (Gupta et al., 2007). The requirements are
                    broken into three different groups: assumed requirements (unspoken), marketplace
                    requirements (spoken), and love-to-have requirements (unspoken). Most often many of
                    the requirements of the customer are unspoken, so indentifying the love-to-have require-
                    ments makes businesses world class.
                      The affinity diagram (Fig. 6.2) is a method used to obtain input from various stake-
                    holders because often suggestion boxes get overlooked or meetings are taken over by




                                 Customer    Very
                                 satisfaction  high      Excitement
                                                           features


                     Degree of                         Performance
                    achievement                           features
                    Low                                       High

                                                 Basic
                                                features
                    Time

                                             Very
                                              low
                     Figure 6.1     Kano model of customer
                     satisfaction.
   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128