Page 209 - Sport Culture and the Media
P. 209

190  || SPORT, CULTURE AND THE MEDIA


                         form and re-form across the media sports cultural complex that we call ‘the
                         audience’ (Ruddock 2001; Balnaves et al. 2002) has to be held together for long
                         enough to register with advertisers, sponsors, sports organizations and govern-
                         ments. Given the stringent demands of these ‘stakeholders’, nothing can be left
                         to chance and no screen sport can just rely on its assumed intrinsic appeal.
                           What we have seen is something not altogether surprising given the nature
                         of sports mythologies and the reliance of the popular media on narrative  –
                         the deployment of different styles and genres to transform what could be the
                         ‘spartan’ act of sports viewing into a luxurious wallowing in spectacle. In the
                         process, the ‘real’ events on screen are coupled with the ‘fictional’ elements of
                         story telling and myth making. As Cunningham and Miller (1994) point out, a
                         key element of this narrativizing impulse is, as in other entertainment forms,
                         the creation and promotion of sportspeople as celebrities. Hence, it can be said
                         that ‘TV sport is an individualizing genre, announcing, auditing and ending the
                         careers of stars’ (Cunningham and Miller 1994: 77). That television is a visual
                         medium gives it a huge advantage over its rival, more flexible electronic medium
                         – radio – in that the viewer to an extent mimicks the everyday encounters of
                         individuals, searching their gestures for meaningful signs of character and per-
                         sonal history. In accentuating the specific character traits of athletes, though,
                         the collective aspects of sport (especially uncomfortable questions of society
                         and politics) are often strategically played down (Hilliard 1994; Benedict
                         1997). Thus, while national or city teams routinely have group traits ascribed to
                         them by television commentators (tough, flamboyant, sneaky, and so on), the
                         simplest and most direct way of developing drama through character is to focus
                         closely on single sportspeople. It is not a very long step from creating sports
                         stars through television to their appearance (as either themselves or another
                         character) on film and then to film stars playing them on the big screen. Feature
                         films that are not documentaries or biographies are moving media sports texts
                         that obey a different logic to live action in starting with the ‘fictional’ (or fictive)
                         and working backwards to the ‘real’ practice of sport.



                         Screen of dreams

                         We have noted above how actual sports action, when caught on screen, is
                         invested with the quality of dramatic  fiction. What happens, then, when
                         sport appears on screen as  fiction? If  ‘unscripted’ screen sport already has
                         recognizable actors, plots, sets, and so on, then its fictional counterpart might
                         be expected to develop these into an even more structured and mythologized
                         cultural entity that operates in the space between the ‘real’ and the ‘imaginary’.
                         Fictional moving media sports texts are subject to different imperatives than
   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214