Page 258 - Standard Handbook Petroleum Natural Gas Engineering VOLUME2
P. 258

Mechanisms & Recovery of  Hydrocarbons by  Natural Means   227


                  Empirical Estimates of  Primary Oil Recovery

                    Several attempts  have  been  made  to  correlate  primary  oil  recovery with
                  reservoir parameters  [239-2421.  Based  on  field  data  [241] from  water-drive
                  reservoirs, a statistical study [242] yielded the following empirical relationship
                  for primary oil recovery:

                    N,  = (0.271910g k+0.25569Sw +0.135510gp, -15,380$
                                                       B,  ’I
                         - 0.00035h+ 0.11403)  7,758Ah$A                       (5-141)


                  where NP is oil production in STB, k is permeability in md, Sw is fractional water
                  saturation, po is oil viscosity in cp, $ is fractional porosity, h is pay thickness in
                  ft, A is  a real extent in ft5, and Boi is the initial formation volume factor of  oil
                  in reservoir barrels per  STB.  Based on  the first API  study [240], correlations
                  were  developed  for  recoverable  oil.  For  solution  gas  drive  reservoirs,  the
                  recoverable oil (RO) in stock tank barrels per net  acre-ft was:
                                                   [Sw]o’37a[ E]
                                                              0.174
                                        1.1611
                                                0.0979
                    RO = 3,2M[ MI- S,) ]  [ 41
                                                                               (5-142)
                                 Bob        p ob
                    For  water drive reservoirs, the correlation was:
                    RO = 4,259[ $(I- s, ’ ]  [ ”1   0.0770  [Sw]4”go3[ E]
                                        1.0422
                                                               4.2159
                                                                               (5143)
                                  B oi      CI oi

                  In the second API study [239], analysis of  116 solution gas drive reservoirs gave
                  the following equation:
                    RO = 6,533[ @(I- S,) ]  [ r] [Sw]o.46s[ y]
                                               0.0816
                                                                 0.249
                                        1.312
                                 Bob       Pch                                 (5-144)
                  However, the second study concluded that none of the equatirms developed in either
                  study  was statistically  appropriate  to  provide  a  valid  correlation.  Furthermore, no
                  statistically valid  correlation was  found  between  oil  recovery  and  definable
                  reservoir parameters. The second study found that when reservoirs were separated
                  by lithology, geographical province, and producing mechanism, the only reason-
                  able  correlations  that  could be  developed were  between  recoverable oil  and
                  original oil in place. Even then, the correlations were of poor quality as indicated
                  by Figure 5-139 which presents the best correlation for Texas sandstone natural-
                  water-drive reservoirs. The  average primary  recovery for  various  groups  of
                  reservoirs at the average value of  OOIP for each group is listed by  production
                  mechanism in Table 5-29 [239,243].
                    In  view  of  the  lack  of  suitable  correlations,  primary  oil  recovery  for  an
                  individual reservoir must be  estimated by  one of  three  methods: (1) material
                  balance  equations  in  conjunction  with  equations  for  gas-oil ratio  and  fluid
   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263