Page 66 - Statistics and Data Analysis in Geology
P. 66

Statistics and Data Analysis in  Geology-   Chapter 3

             Thus, there are three negative and three positive terms in the determinant.  Sum-
             ming according to the signs just found yields a single number, which is
                            -
                                        +
                 + ~~11~~2~33 alla~3m a12a23a31 - a12a21a33 + a13a21a32 - a13ma31
                 We  can now try a matrix of  real values:

                                               4 3 2
                                                2  4  1
                                                1 0 3
             The six terms possible are
                                            (4 x 4 x 3) = 48
                                                         0
                                            (4~1~0)=
                                            (3xlxl)=  3
                                            (3~2~3)=18
                                            (2XZXO)=  0
                                            (2X4X1)=  8
             The first, third, and fifth of  these require an even number of  transpositions for
             proper arrangement of the second subscript and so are positive. The others require
              an odd number of  transpositions and are therefore negative. Summing, we have

                                  det A = +48 - 0 + 3 - 18 + 0 - 8 = 25

             This method of  evaluating a determinant is described by Pettofrezzo (1978).  A
             more conventional approach (see, for example, Anton and Rorres, 1994) uses what
             is called the “method of  cofactors,” but the two can be shown to be equivalent.
                 We  now have at ow command a system for reducing a square matrix into its
              determinant, but no clear grasp of  what  a determinant “really is.”  Determinants
              arise in many ways, but they appear most  conspicuously during the solution of
              sets of  simultaneous equations. You may not have noticed them, however, because
              they have been hidden in the inversion process we have been using.
                  Consider the set of  equations:

                                          a11x1+ al~x2 = bl
                                          azm + mx2 = b2

              Expressed in matrix form, this becomes





              and we  have discussed how the vector of  unknown x’s can be solved by matrix
              inversion. However, with algebraic rearrangement, the unknowns also can be found
              by the equations
                                               bla22 - alzb2
                                         x1  =
                                              a11a22 - a12a21
              and




              138
   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71