Page 235 -
P. 235

CHAPTER 6 • STRATEGY ANALYSIS AND CHOICE  201
                 gic decisions, but they should never be used to dictate the choice of strategies. Behavioral,
                 cultural, and political aspects of strategy generation and selection are always important to
                 consider and manage. Because of increased legal pressure from outside groups, boards of
                 directors are assuming a more active role in strategy analysis and choice. This is a positive
                 trend for organizations.


                 Key Terms and Concepts

                 Aggressive Quadrant (p. 182)                   Input Stage (p. 176)
                 Attractiveness Scores (AS) (p. 193)            Internal-External (IE) Matrix (p. 184)
                 Board of Directors (p. 198)                    Matching (p. 177)
                 Boston Consulting Group (BCG) Matrix (p. 184)  Matching Stage (p. 176)
                 Business Portfolio (p. 184)                    Quantitative Strategic Planning Matrix
                 Cash Cows (p. 186)                                (QSPM) (p. 192)
                 Champions (p. 197)                             Question Marks (p. 186)
                 Competitive Position (CP) (p. 181)             Relative Market Share Position (p. 184)
                 Competitive Quadrant (p. 184)                  SO Strategies (p. 178)
                 Conservative Quadrant (p. 184)                 Stability Position (SP) (p. 181)
                 Culture (p. 196)                               Stars (p. 186)
                 Decision Stage (p. 176)                        Strategic Position and Action Evaluation (SPACE)
                 Defensive Quadrant (p. 184)                       Matrix (p. 181)
                 Directional Vector (p. 182)                    Strategy-Formulation Framework (p. 177)
                 Dogs (p. 187)                                  Strengths-Weaknesses Opportunities-Threats (SWOT)
                 Equifinality (p.197 )                             Matrix (p. 178)
                 Financial Position (FP) (p. 181)               ST Strategies (p. 178)
                 Governance (p. 198)                            Sum Total Attractiveness Scores (STAS) (p. 195)
                 Grand Strategy Matrix (p. 191)                 Total Attractiveness Scores (TAS) (p. 195)
                 Halo Error (p. 177)                            WO Strategies (p. 178)
                 Industry Position (IP) (p. 181)                WT Strategies (p. 179)



                 Issues for Review and Discussion

                  1.  Many multidivisional firms do not report revenues or profits by division or segment in their
                     Form 10K or Annual Report. What are the pros and cons of this management practice?
                     Discuss.
                  2.  Define halo error. How can halo error inhibit selecting the best strategies to pursue?
                  3.  List six drawbacks of using only subjective information in formulating strategies.
                  4.  For a firm that you know well, give an example SO Strategy, showing how an internal
                     strength can be matched with an external opportunity to formulate a strategy.
                  5.  For a firm that you know well, give an example WT Strategy, showing how an internal weak-
                     ness can be matched with an external threat to formulate a strategy.
                  6.  List three limitations of the SWOT matrix and analysis.
                  7.  For the following three firms using the given factors, calculate a reasonable Stability Position
                     (SP) coordinate to go on their SPACE Matrix axis, given what you know about the nature
                     of those industries.

                 Factors                    Winnebago       Apple     U.S. Postal Service
                 Barriers to entry into market
                 Seasonal nature of business
                 Technological changes
                   SP Score

                  8.  Would the angle or degrees of the vector in a SPACE Matrix be important in generating
                     alternative strategies? Explain.
   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240