Page 29 - Critical Dialogues in Cultural Studies
P. 29

INTRODUCTION 17

              the  one  through  the  other,  without  falling  into  psychoanalytic
              readings of everything.
                                                                (1992c:291)

            This tension is most clearly addressed in the interview ‘The formation of a
            diasporic intellectual’ (chapter 25).

                       ESSENTIALISMS, POLITICS AND IDENTITIES

            At  the  Illinois  conference,  Hall  also  referred  to  the  way  in  which  his
            relation  to  marxism  was  necessarily  inflected  by  his  ‘not-yet  completed
            contestation  with  the  profound  Eurocentrism  of  marxist  theory’
            (chapter  13,  265).  The  major  problem  he  identifies  there  concerns
            traditional  marxist  theory’s  basic  stress  on  the  internal  dynamic  of  the
            development  of  capitalism  and  its  relative  neglect  of  the  question  of
            imperialism  and  colonialism.  As  he  puts  it  in  ‘Cultural  identity  and
            diaspora’, the missing (‘third’) term is, in a sense, quite particularly his own
            —the Caribbean, as the ‘Third… New World…the “empty” land…where
            strangers  from  every  other  part  of  the  globe  collided’  (1990a:  234).  In  a
            striking use of a psychoanalytic figure, he proposes that ‘The New World is
            the  third  term—the  primal  scene—where  the  fateful/fatal  encounter  was
            staged  between  Africa  and  the  West’  (ibid.:  234;  for  the  development  of
            these arguments, see, in particular, ‘The West and the rest’, 1992).
              As  noted  earlier,  Hall’s  (1985)  essay  on  ‘Gramsci’s  relevance  for  the
            study of race and ethnicity’ (chapter 20, here) can be seen as a turning-point
            in the substantive focus of his work, as it moved towards its present central
            concerns—with  questions  of  ‘race’,  ethnicity  and  cultural  identity.
            Nonetheless,  the  essay  also  contains  a  set  of  important  theoretical
            continuities,  in  its  arguments  concerning  the  need  to  develop  modes  of
            analysis—whether  to  be  applied  to  questions  of  class,  ‘race’,  gender  or
            ethnicity (or indeed, their intersections)—which are non-reductive and non-
            essentialist.  It  is  from  Gramsci’s  militantly  conjunctural  historical
            perspective  on  class  formations  that  Hall  derives,  in  part,  the  conceptual
            model for his later, non-essentialist analyses of race and ethnicity. It is, as it
            were, in substantial part on the basis of the theoretical gains made in the
            formative  encounter  with  Gramsci  that,  in  his  influential  essay  on  ‘New
            ethnicities’ (1988; reprinted here as chapter 21), Hall declares the ‘end of
            the innocent notion of the essential black subject’ (see the parallel debates
            between Hall et al. and Coward, concerning ‘Class, culture and the social
            formation’, 1977).
              In  the  ‘New  ethnicities’  essay,  Hall  insists  that,  rather  than  falling  into
            essentialist  perspectives  on  the  issues  at  stake  (which  would
            replicate  traditional  marxism’s  mistakes,  concerning  the  nature  of  ‘pre-
            given’  class  subjects—(see  Laclau  and  Mouffe,  1985)  we  must  recognize
   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34