Page 36 - Critical Dialogues in Cultural Studies
P. 36

Chapter 1
                           The problem of ideology
                           Marxism without guarantees


                                      Stuart Hall






            In the past two or three decades, marxist theory has been going through a
            remarkable,  but  lop-sided  and  uneven  revival.  On  the  one  hand,  it  has
            come once again to provide the principal pole of opposition to ‘bourgeois’
            social  thought.  On  the  other  hand,  many  young  intellectuals  have  passed
            through the revival and, after a heady and rapid apprenticeship, gone right
            out the other side again. They have ‘settled their accounts’ with marxism
            and moved on to fresh intellectual fields and pastures: but not quite. Post-
            marxism  remains  one  of  our  largest  and  most  flourishing  contemporary
            theoretical  schools.  The  post-marxists  use  marxist  concepts  while
            constantly demonstrating their inadequacy. They seem, in fact, to continue
            to  stand  on  the  shoulders  of  the  very  theories  they  have  just  definitely
            destroyed.  Had  marxism  not  existed,  ‘post-marxism’  would  have  had  to
            invent  it,  so  that  ‘deconstructing’  it  once  more  would  give  the
            ‘deconstructionists’  something  further  to  do.  All  this  gives  marxism  a
            curious  life-after-death  quality.  It  is  constantly  being  ‘transcended’  and
            ‘preserved’.  There  is  no  more  instructive  site  from  which  to  observe  this
            process than that of ideology itself.
              I do not intend to trace through once again the precise twists and turns of
            these recent disputes, nor to try to follow the intricate theorizing which has
            attended them. Instead, I want to place the debates about ideology in the
            wider  context  of  marxist  theory  as  a  whole.  I  also  want  to  pose  it  as  a
            general  problem—a  problem  of  theory,  because  it  is  also  a  problem  of
            politics  and  strategy.  I  want  to  identify  the  most  telling  weaknesses  and
            limitations  in  the  classical  marxist  formulations  about  ideology;  and  to
            assess what has been gained, what deserves to be lost, and what needs to be
            retained—and perhaps rethought—in the light of the critiques.


            Reprinted from the Journal of Communication Inquiry (1986), 10(2), 28–44. This
            essay  originally  appeared  in  Marx:  100  Years  On,  B.Matthews,  (ed.)  London:
            Lawrence & Wishart, 1983, 57–84. We wish to thank the publisher for permission
            to reprint it here.
   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41