Page 257 - Successful Onboarding
P. 257

238 • Successful Onboarding


        who recruit product marketing talent if you are a consumer product com-
        pany). Properly executed, onboarding can distinguish a firm in the eyes of
        new hires and provide competitive advantage in recruiting this top talent.
        Speaking with transfer employees from other peer organizations is a great
        place to start. Some companies also choose to conduct highly detailed
        peer benchmarking analyses to develop a clear differentiation strategy.
           Suppose you represent Caterpillar and you are seeking engineering tal-
        ent that can enable you to design a whole new tractor that is less costly or
        that uses hybrid technology. In deciding which companies to benchmark
        against for recruitment purposes, you might consider Toyota or other
        companies looking to bring hybrid technologies, as well as other leading
        engineering organizations like Lockheed Martin, GE, Intel, or Google.
        Similarly, if you’re trying to bring in top MBAs, you might want to look at
        how consulting firms, leading marketing companies, and top investment
        banks are approaching onboarding, since these are your prime competi-
        tors for talent. If you are in an industry in which your corporation hires
        regional talent, then you need to look at who else is competing for that
        same talent, including smaller, regional firms that at first glance would
        seem to be in a different league than your own.


        Opportunity identification

        With a good sense of best practices and competitor practices in hand, we
        now need to analyze the data so as to identify the most important oppor-
        tunities and come up with recommendations. This part of the process has
        several steps. First, you should conduct a quantitative analysis of the gap,
        if any, between your current performance and both your desired per-
        formance and external benchmarks. Such analysis should be done for
        specific geographies, business units, and functions; that way, you will
        understand the diverging needs and performance levels of different parts
        of the organization. You will also be able to identify areas across the organ-
        ization that require greater investment and prioritization. You might even
        wind up deciding to focus on only one part or cross-section of the organ-
        ization (for instance, one business function) so as to realize the most busi-
        ness impact. Once you have determined where the gaps are and their size,
        you should determine the root causes behind these gaps. This in turn
   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262