Page 184 - Sustainability Communication Interdisciplinary Perspectives and Theoritical Foundations
P. 184
14 Corporate Sustainability Reporting 167
References
Adams, C., & Frost, G. (2006). Accessibility and functionality of the corporate web site:
Implications for sustainability reporting. Business Strategy and the Environment, 15, 275–287.
Adams, C., & Narayanan, V. (2007). The ‘standardization’ of sustainability reporting. In
J. Unerman, J. Bebbington, & B. O’Dwyer (Eds.), Sustainability accounting and accountability
(pp. 70–85). London: Routledge.
Bebbington, J., Brown, J., Frame, B., & Thomson, I. (2007). Theorizing engagement: The poten-
tial of a critical dialogic approach. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 20,
356–381.
Bebbington, J., Larrinaga, C., & Moneva, J. M. (2008). Corporate social reporting and reputation
risk management. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 21, 337–361.
Buhr, N. (2007). Histories of and rationales for sustainability reporting. In J. Unerman,
J. Bebbington, & B. O’Dwyer (Eds.), Sustainability accounting and accountability (pp. 57–69).
London: Routledge.
Bundesumweltministerium (BMU) (German Federal Ministry for the Environment). (2007).
EMAS. Von der Umwelterklärung zum Nachhaltigkeitsbericht (EMAS. From the environmental
statement to the sustainability report; only available in German). Berlin: BMU.
Crane, A., & Livesey, S. (2003). Are you talking to me? Stakeholder communication and the risks
and rewards of dialogue. In J. Andriof, S. Waddock, B. Husted, & S. S. Rhaman (Eds.),
Unfolding stakeholder thinking 2. Relationships, communication, reporting and performance
(pp. 39–52). Sheffield: Greenleaf.
Deegan, C. (2002). The legitimising effect of social and environmental disclosures: A theoretical
foundation. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 15, 282–311.
Dierkes, M., & Antal, B. (1985). The usefulness and use of social reporting information.
Accounting, Organizations and Society, 10, 29–34.
ECC Kohtes Klewes. (2003). Global stakeholder report 2003. Shared values? The First World-
Wide stakeholder survey on non-financial reporting. Bonn: ECC Group.
European Union (EU). (2003). Directives 2003/51/EC of the European Parliament and of the
Council of 18 June 2003 amending Directives 78/660/EEC, 83/349/EEC, 86/635/EEC and
91/674/EEC on the annual and consolidated accounts of certain types of companies, banks and
other financial institutions and insurance undertakings. Official Journal of the European Union,
17th July 2003.
Fombrun, C. (1996). Reputation: Realizing value from the corporate image. Boston: Harvard
Business Press.
Global Reporting Initiative (GRI). (2004). High 5! Communicating your business success through
sustainability reporting. A guide for small and not-so-small businesses. Amsterdam: GRI.
Global Reporting Initiative (GRI). (2006). Sustainability reporting guidelines 2006. Amsterdam: GRI.
Gond, J.-P., & Herrbach, O. (2006). Social reporting as an organisational learning tool? A theoreti-
cal framework. Journal of Business Ethics, 65, 359–371.
Gray, R. H. (2006). Social, environmental and sustainability reporting and organisational value
creation? Whose value? Whose creation? Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal,
19, 793–819.
Gray, R. H., Kouhy, R., & Lavers, S. (1995). Corporate social and environmental reporting:
A review of the literature and a longitudinal study of UK disclosure. Accounting, Auditing and
Accountability Journal, 8, 47–77.
Gunningham, N., & Grabosky, P. (1998). Smart regulation: Designing environmental policy.
Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Guthrie, J., & Parker, L. D. (1989). Corporate social reporting: Emerging trends in accountability
and theory. Accounting and Business Research, 19, 343–352.
Hemmer, E. (1996). Sozialbilanzen. Das Scheitern einer gescheiterten Idee [Social reporting]. The
failure of a failed idea. Arbeitgeber, 23, 796–800.