Page 600 - Sustainable Cities and Communities Design Handbook
P. 600

“Scrappy” Sustainability at Ohio Wesleyan University Chapter j 29 567


                In the fall of 2014, another Environmental Studies student, Allie France,
             noticed the large amount of waste thrown away in our campus dining halls,
             especially the throw-away takeout containers, used by many students on
             campus, which could be seen filling many of the campus garbage receptacles
             after lunch and dinner. Why doesn’t OWU use reusable carryout containers?
             This is the kind of question one often hears from environmentally-conscious
             students. The course instructor suggested Allie do something about the situ-
             ation as a course project. Allie embarked on what she thought would be an
             easy task: convince our campus food service to offer reusable containers.
             However, such sustainability efforts are never easy.
                Initially Allie was encouraged by the response from campus food service:
             they would love to offer students reusable carryout containers. Alas, soon
             afterward it became evident that our old campus industrial dishwasher could
             not handle the increased demand for washing reusable containers. Indeed, the
             shift to throw-away containers and utensils was in part the result of the
             inadequate dishwasher. All of a sudden Allie was faced with learning much
             more about industrial dishwashers than she ever imagined. What she suspected
             was that our old dishwasher was very inefficient, and a new dishwasher would
             quickly recoup costs due to energy savings alone while allowing the OWU
             food service to offer reusable food containers. At this point the semester was
             over, as was Allie’s course project. In the spring, Allie continued to work on
             the project. She worked with Buildings & Grounds to develop a return on
             investment (ROI) analysis for a new dishwasher. She then had to go to the
             campus Finance Officer. There were many infrastructure projects on campus
             ahead of the dishwasher, and, indeed, it was not even on the radar. However,
             the short ROI (around 2 years) and the fact that Allie had drawn attention to
             the issue moved the effort forward, a new dishwasher was purchased and
             installed in the spring of 2015 and reusable food containers were offered in the
             fall of 2015.
                The reusable food container initiative faced some significant hurdles, again
             illustrating how complicated initiating sustainability projects can be
             (Fig. 29.4). Unfortunately, despite each container having a bar code, our
             campus information system (used by food service, the library, for student
             records, and IDs, etc.) was old enough that there was no easy way to modify
             the code to allow students to “check out” reusable containers. Replacing the
             campuswide information system was also not feasible. Thus students paid $5
             when they took a reusable container and were given $5 when they personally
             handed the containers back at certain food service locations on campus. A
             student project in the fall of 2016 surveyed students about the reusable con-
             tainers. The additional effort involved in returning the containers proved too
             much for many students. In addition, some students indicated that carrying
             around the reusable container suggested the image of an “eco freak.” These
             students were all for the reusable containers, but they did not seem themselves
             as part of the “ecological clique” on campus and felt uncomfortable using the
   595   596   597   598   599   600   601   602   603   604   605