Page 150 - Sustainable On-Site CHP Systems Design, Construction, and Operations
P. 150

Carbon Footprint—Envir onmental Benefits and Emission Contr ols       123



         Emission Control                Combustion Turbine Capacity (MW)
         Technology      5 Continuous 25 Continuous 100 Continuous 25 Peaking  100 Peaking
         Water Injection
         Installed cost ($)  544,000   1,140,000  2,560,000      1,140,000   2,560,000
         Annual operating    165,000    408,000  1,180,000        248,000     624,000
         cost ($)
         Cost-effectiveness  1,390–1,780  690–880  500–640     1,670–2,150 1,050–1,350
         ($/ton)
         Steam Injection
         Installed cost ($)  710,000   1,161,000  3,900,000      1,610,000   3,900,000
         Annual operating    185,000    448,000  1,250,000        319,000     813,000
         cost ($)
         Cost-effectiveness  1,560–2,000  760–970  520–670     2,150–2,760 1,370–1,760
         ($/ton)
         DLN
         Installed cost ($)  482,000   1,100,000  2,400,000      1,100,000   2,400,000
         Annual operating     63,400    145,000    316,000        258,000     316,000
         cost ($)
         Cost-effectiveness   530–800   240–370   130–200       980–1,470     530–800
         ($/ton)
         SCR
         Installed cost ($)  572,000   1,540,000  3,300,000      1,540,000   3,300,000
         Annual operating    258,000    732,000  2,190,000        517,000    1,430,000
         cost ($)
         Cost-effectiveness  2,180–2,450 1,230–1,390  920–1,030  3,480–3,920 2,400–2,700
         ($/ton)

        Source: Combined Heating, Cooling, and Power Handbook (2002).

        TABLE 7-5  Examples of Installed and Annual Operating Costs and Cost-Effectiveness for Emission
        Control Technologies Commercially Available for Combustion Turbines


                Some examples of the installed and operating costs and cost-effectiveness (cost of
             removing 1 ton of NO ) of water injection, steam injection, and DLN are shown in Table 7-5
                               x
             for various capacities of combustion turbine for continuous and peaking operations.
             Post-Combustion Treatment
             In this technology category, selective catalytic reduction (SCR), as discussed earlier
             under reciprocating engines, is also used for treating exhaust gases from combustion
             turbine systems. A typical process-flow diagram of an SCR system for a gas turbine is
             shown in Fig. 7-5 and some examples of the installed and operating costs and cost-
             effectiveness (cost of removing 1 ton of NO ) of SCR are shown in Table 7-5 various
                                                   x
             capacities of combustion turbine for continuous and peaking operations.
   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155