Page 269 - Sustainable On-Site CHP Systems Design, Construction, and Operations
P. 269

242    C o ns truction


             they are resolved can lead to direct enforcement consequences. Many environmental
             regulations include provisions for equipment malfunction that protect the facility
             operator from enforcement action if prescribed steps are taken to curtail operations,
             correct the malfunction, and appropriately notify the regulatory agency. Facility operating
             procedures should include provisions for responding to equipment malfunction and
             identify specific channels of communication between operators, supervisors, and the
             regulatory agency. Deadlines for corrective action, agency notification, and potential
             equipment shutdown should also be included in formal operating procedures.

             Compliance Monitoring
             The facility operator must develop and implement a monitoring plan that ensures com-
             pliance with permit conditions and regulatory standards. An effective monitoring
             program ensures that operating staff will take uniform steps on a regular basis to pro-
             mote environmental compliance. If the plan is adhered to, it can help to prevent envi-
             ronmental upsets and can also demonstrate to regulators that the facility operator is
             diligent in managing environmental compliance. This demonstration may lessen the
             impact of enforcement actions, should an upset occur.

             Emissions Monitoring
             The use of CEMS is discussed in the preceding section of this chapter, but not all CHP
             facilities are subject to CEMS requirements. Compliance for many smaller systems can
             be adequately managed by monitoring various engine operating parameters on a daily
             basis. The operating permit will likely identify those parameters that help to demon-
             strate that systems are functioning properly and that compliance with emission limits
             can be expected. For reciprocating internal combustion engines, monitoring parameters
             often include air-to-fuel controller malfunction sensors, exhaust O  levels, accumulated
                                                                    2
             operating hours and fuel flow rates (or accumulated flow). These parameters indicate if
             the engine is operating as specified, and also if operating throughput limits may be
             exceeded. If the engine operates in conjunction with a post-combustion emissions con-
             trol device, the operator may also be required to monitor inlet catalyst temperature, and
             catalyst inlet/outlet pressure differentials. If the control system relies upon the use of
             ammonia or urea, the flow rates of these reactants may be monitored. These parameters
             help to demonstrate if the emission control system is functioning and if catalyst fouling
             may occur. In some cases, permits include power output based emission limits
             (lb/MW-h or kg/MW-h), and permits sometimes allow for more lenient emission
             limits when heat is recovered. In these cases, it may be necessary to monitor power
             output and heat recovery rates. If the CHP system is based upon the use of a gas turbine,
             the monitoring parameters will not differ significantly than those that are applicable to
             reciprocating internal combustion engines, except that there is no need to monitor oxygen
             or air-to-fuel characteristics.
                In the absence of a CEMS, it may be necessary to monitor CO and NO  emissions on
                                                                          x
             a periodic basis using a handheld analyzer. Handheld monitoring devices are proven to
             be reliable and accurate indicators of emissions concentrations, but their use as an
             official compliance determination is dependent upon adherence to a stringent quality
             assurance program. Because of this practical limitation, periodic emissions monitoring
             programs are commonly used only to supplement, rather than replace, parametric
             monitoring and official source tests. If a periodic monitoring program is implemented,
             the operator must develop formal procedures for conducting tests and responding to
   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273   274