Page 86 -
P. 86

IDENTIFYING  THE  DRIVERS  OF  ISD  METHOD  EMERGENCE     71
                    Jayaratna, N. 1994. Understanding and Evaluating Methodologies, NIMSAD: A Systemic Framework.
                      London: McGraw-Hill.
                    Kautz, K. 2004. The enactment of methodology—the case of developing a multimedia information system.
                      In Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems, Washington, DC, December
                      12–15.
                    Kautz, K., and Nielsen, P.A. 2004. Understanding the implementation of software process improvement
                      innovations in software organisations. Information Systems Journal, 14, 1, 3–22.
                    Lyytinen, K. 1987. A taxonomic perspective of information systems development, theoretical constructs and
                      recommendations. In R.J. Boland et al. (eds.), Critical Issues in Information System Research. Chichester,
                      UK: Wiley, 3–41.
                    Madsen, S. 2004. Emerging methods—an interpretive study of ISD methods in practice. Ph.D. diss. Køben-
                      havn: Samfundslitteratur.
                    Madsen, S., and Kautz, K. 2002. Applying systems development methods in practice—the RUP example. In
                      J. Grundspenkis et al. (eds.), Information Systems Development: Advances in Methodologies, Components
                      and Management. New York: Kluwer, 267–278.
                    Madsen, S.; Kautz, K.; and Vidgen, R.T. 2005. Method emergence—influences and consequences. In Pro-
                      ceedings of the Thirteenth European Conference on Information Systems, Regensburg, Germany, May
                      26–28.
                    ———. 2006. A framework for understanding how a unique and local IS development method emerges in
                      practice. European Journal of Information Systems, 15, 225–238.
                    Mathiassen, L. 1998. Reflective systems development. Dissertation. Aalborg University.
                    Pentland, B.T. 1999. Building process theory with narrative: from description to explanation. Academy of
                      Management Review, 24, 4, 711–724.
                    Pettigrew, A.M. 1985. Contextualist research and the study of organisational change processes. In E. Mumford
                      et al. (eds.), Research Methods in Information Systems. Amsterdam: North-Holland, Elsevier, 53–78.
                    ———. 1987. Context and action in the transformation of the firm. Journal of Management Studies, 24, 6,
                      649–670.
                    Sambamurthy, V., and Kirsch, L.J. 2000. An integrative framework of the information systems development
                      process. Decision Sciences (ABI/INFORM Global), 31, 2, 391–411.
                    Stolterman, E. 1991. The hidden rationality of design work—a study in the methodology and practice of
                      system development. Ph.D. diss.  Institute of Information Processing, University of Umeå, Sweden.
                    ———. 1992. How system designers think about design and methods—some reflections based on an inter-
                      view study. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 4, 137–150.
                    ———. 1994. The transfer of rationality, acceptability, adaptability and transparency of methods. In Pro-
                      ceedings of the Second European Conference on Information Systems. Breukeln: Nijehrode University
                      Press, 533–540.
                    Stolterman, E., and Russo, N.L. 1997. The paradox of information systems methods: public and private
                      rationality. In Proceedings of the British Computer Society’s Fifth Annual Conference on Information
                      System Methodologies, Lancaster, England.
                    Sørensen, M.H. 1997. Development of development methodologies. In B. Fibinger (ed.), Design of Multi-
                      media. Aalborg: Aalborg University, 61–84.
                    Truex, D.; Baskerville, R.; and Travis, J. 2000. Amethodical systems development: the deferred meaning of
                      systems development methods. Accounting Management & Information Technologies, 10, 1, 53–79.
                    Van de Ven, A., and Poole, M.S. 1995. Explaining development and change in organizations. Academy of
                      Management Review, 20, 3, 510–540.
                    Vidgen, R.T. 2002. WISDM: constructing a Web information system development methodology. Information
                      Systems Journal, 12, 3, 247–261.
                    Vidgen, R.T.; Avison, D.E.; Wood, J.R.G.; and Wood-Harper, T.A. 2002. Developing Web Information Sys-
                      tems. Oxford: Elsevier.
                    Walsham, G. 1993. Interpreting Information Systems in Organisations. Chichester, UK: Wiley, Wiley Series
                      on Information Systems.
                    ———. 1995. Interpretive case studies in IS research: nature and method. European Journal of Information
                      Systems, 4, 74–81.
                    Walz, D.B.; Elam, J.J.; and Curtis, B. 1993. Inside a software design team: knowledge acquisition, sharing,
                      and integration. Communications of the ACM, 36, 10 (October), 63–77.
   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91