Page 181 - The Bible On Leadership
P. 181

Courage                                                       167


                to commit to genetic engineering. Regardless of whether you agree
                with Nestle’s stance on this controversial topic, they have embraced
                that stance with great courage. And they have not blindly ignored op-
                posing points of view; they have listened, but in the end have not been
                moved.
                  Nestle CEO Peter Brabeck-Letmathe observes, ‘‘In this world, there
                are followers and leaders. Leaders have courage—they can stand up
                against the barrage of public opinion that comes at them and say, ‘I have
                thought about this subject, and I have come to the conclusion that this
                is the best decision. We are not going to capitulate.’ ’’ Whereas other
                large companies reversed their initial support of genetic engineering,
                Nestle did not reverse itself or apologize. They asked well-known pro-
                fessors to write their opinions on genetic engineering. Then they re-
                viewed and discussed the information. As Brabeck-Letmathe writes:
                ‘‘We are a global company with global responsibilities. We have to
                think about the millions in the world who are hungry . . . For these
                reasons, we took a stand. We will pursue this technology. The reaction
                from the press and the public has not been happy—but that is why you
                need nerves of steel in business today. Otherwise, you will never stay
                           15
                the course.’’ Brabeck-Letmathe’s strong resolve is reminiscent of the
                early Christians, who sustained themselves with messages reminding all
                to be courageous: ‘‘Therefore, my dear brothers, stand firm. Let noth-
                ing move you.’’ (Paul in 1 Cor. 15:58)
                  On the opposite side of the corporate and political spectrum, con-
                sider the courage of Ben & Jerry’s. Ben Cohen and Jerry Greenfield,
                the two eccentric founders, had an appropriately eccentric plan to make
                a public stock offering to the residents of Vermont, where the average
                income is considerably lower than in New York and where the average
                citizen does not consider himself much of a ‘‘venture capitalist.’’ But
                Ben & Jerry’s wanted a stock offering that was accessible to the average
                person, even in a relatively low-income state.
                  In most stock offerings, the minimum purchase is $2,000. Ben &
                Jerry’s proposed a minimum purchase of $126! Every stockbroker and
                adviser they consulted said this venture would fail. They told Ben &
                Jerry’s that you can’t raise almost a million dollars in hundred-dollar
   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186