Page 219 - Bruce Ellig - The Complete Guide to Executive Compensation (2007)
P. 219

Chapter 5. Salary                           205


                                Rating
                        Numeric         Verbal             Objective Attainment

                           4          Outstanding  Significantly surpassed or
                                                     surpassed over major obstacles

                           3           Superior    Surpassed over obstacles or
                                                     achieved over major obstacles

                           2           Very good   Surpassed or
                                                     achieved over obstacles or
                                                     almost achieved over major obstacles

                           1            Good       Achieved or
                                                     almost achieved over obstacles or
                                                     partially achieved over major obstacles
                           0          Acceptable   Partially achieved or
                                                     little accomplishment over major obstacles

                           0           Marginal    Little accomplished or
                                                     nothing accomplished over major obstacles

                           0         Unacceptable  Nothing accomplished
                                                             Promotability

                           2           Excellent   Likely for more than one promotion
                           1            Good       Likely for one promotion

           Table 5-23. Performance and “promotability” ratings

               Another way to build difficulty into the rating process is to factor the rating up or down,
           based on stretch or lack thereof in the goal. Typically, goals when totaled equal 100. If they
           are too easy, the manager might mark them down to total 95 or 90. Conversely, for a person
           with more difficult stretch goals, the total might be 105 or 110. In both situations, the totaled
           scores are divided by 100. The impact is shown in Table 5-24. The example shows two
           different individuals, but it could be the same person after having decided to be more aggres-
           sive, taking on the more difficult goal E and adding in goal F. Because executive A accepted
           only a 15-point weighting for goal A vs. the standard of a 25, it was possible only to have a
           total weighting 10 points below the standard. Conversely, executive B took on the addition
           of goal F, worth 10 points. Had the 350 total points been divided by 110, the rating would
           have been 3.18. Because it was divided by 100, the executive was rewarded with a 3.50.

           Objectives vs. Goals. When defining performance expectations, typically one describes
           objectives and goals. Objectives are usually qualitative targets, while goals are usually quanti-
           tative targets, although some companies reverse the two. (The confusion may be due to
           origin. Sports-minded individuals know goals are scores in football, hockey, and soccer.
           Military types think in terms of objectives, such as “take that hill.”) The first step is to define
   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224