Page 517 - Bruce Ellig - The Complete Guide to Executive Compensation (2007)
P. 517

Chapter 8. Long-Term Incentives                   503


               This illustrates the importance of the definition of “shares owned.” Depending on the
           definition used, the executive has anywhere between two to eight times salary (i.e., 20,000 to
           80,000 shares) in company stock for a salary of $1 million and stock price of $100 a share.
           Therefore, one would expect that a more liberal definition of stock owned to require a
           higher number of shares be held.
               However, when individuals cash out stock options without retaining any shares (some-
           times called flipping) there is no increase in the number of shares owned, and, depending on
           the definition of shares owned, the number may actually have decreased. One way to deter-
           mine how aggressively executives have cashed in their stock options is to look up the total
           number of shares exercised, say over the last five years, and compare that to stock currently
           held. Or, even better, if records are available, how many shares were owned 10 years ago?
           Table 8-81 compares the transactions of three individuals.


                                         Shares Owned             Shares Exercised
                                                                  in Last Five Years
                                 Five Years Ago        Now
                  Person A            5,000            10,000          200,000
                  Person B            5,000            25,000          200,000

                  Person C            5,000           100,000          200,000
           Table 8-81. Shares exercised vs. owned

               Here we see that each owned 5,000 shares five years ago, and each exercised options on
           200,000 shares in the five-year period. Person C apparently kept most, if not all, of the shares
           exercised after paying taxes. Person A essentially cashed out the grants, and person B made
           some progress toward whatever target he or she was assigned. Even if the records for five
           years earlier are unavailable, one can still see the differences in the exercise strategies of the
           three by simply comparing the shares currently owned with those exercised over the past five
           years. Person A retained only 5,000 of the 200,000 shares exercised (2.5 percent), whereas
           person C retained 95,000 of the 200,000 exercised (48 percent). It is not difficult to see who
           is trying to build stock ownership.

           Guidelines or Requirements? Ownership objectives can be met in one of three ways
           (or any combination thereof): encouraged by the company, rewarded through plan design,
           and/or mandated by the company. The first is one of objective by leadership; typically,
           the CEO takes an aggressive personal ownership in company stock and asks other senior
           executives to join in. The second is through a number of stock-plan features described
           earlier, including option reloads, additional share awards for exercised options held for a
           stated period, share deposit options, cancellation of nonrecourse loans, and other devices.
           The third is more straightforward. Individuals are given a number of years (typically five) to
           attain the stated number of shares. Barring unusual circumstances, the person may be denied
           new options until the requirement is met.
               In meeting guidelines, progress is typically tracked annually, as illustrated in Table 8-82.
           Note that the executive is still 5,000 shares below the target, although ownership has
   512   513   514   515   516   517   518   519   520   521   522