Page 167 - The Disneyization of Society
P. 167

THE DISNEYIZATION OF SOCIETY



                   an implied critique of the concept of McDonaldization. If there is a critical
                   element in the concept of Disneyization when juxtaposed with McDonaldization,
           158     it is to suggest that McDonaldization does not fully capture some of the changes
                   that are occurring in the service and consumption spheres in modern society –
                   changes that are the subject of the preceding chapters – and that the concept of
                   Disneyization does address these transformations. Equally, Disneyization leaves the
                   door open for other narratives of large-scale change that, along with McDonaldization,
                   provide useful accounts of what is going on in the modern economy and its culture.
                     Consumption also connects with another major theme in this chapter, namely,
                   globalization. Disneyization is depicted as a globalizing force in that it is spread-
                   ing in various ways and degrees to different parts of the globe. The link between
                   consumption and globalization is not a coincidence, of course. What Sklair calls
                   ‘the culture-ideology of consumerism’ is one of the main factors in the spread of
                                        2
                   global capitalism today. Consumption provides both the rationale and the motor
                   for much of what we see as denoting globalization. In treating Disneyization in
                   this chapter as linked to both consumption and globalization, it is being depicted
                   as a potent means of increasing the consumption of services and goods that is
                   spreading across the globe.



                                      Disneyization as Systemscape


                   One way in which Disneyization and McDonaldization can be viewed as parallel
                   processes is that both can be viewed as signals of globalization, the sense that the
                   world is becoming one place in which national boundaries become less significant
                   than in earlier times. Ritzer makes this point in relation to McDonaldization in his
                                   3
                   more recent work, and it is apparent that the dimensions of Disneyization out-
                   lined previously are similarly spreading globally, the implications of which are
                   given further attention below. But what is striking about Disneyization and
                   McDonaldization is that they are not to do with the global diffusion of products.
                   Much of the writing on globalization is full of hyperbole about the global spread
                   and recognizability of prominent brands: Nike, Coca-Cola, Pepsi, Pizza Hut,
                   Starbucks, KFC, Benetton, Body Shop and so on. And, of course, one could hardly
                   disregard Mickey’s ears and Walt’s signature or the golden arches of McDonald’s
                   as symbols involved in the global travels of brand names.
                     But the spread of well-known brand names is  not what Disneyization (and
                   McDonaldization) are about: they are concerned essentially with the diffusion of
                   modes of delivery of goods and services. McDonaldization relates primarily to a
                   mode of delivery in the sense of the production of goods and services. It is a means
                   of providing an efficient and highly predictable product and service in a manner
                   that would have met with the approval of Henry Ford and Frederick Winslow
   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172