Page 30 - The Drucker Lectures
P. 30

The Myth of the State  [  11

                       ual. It enables our reason to direct and to determine our reaction
                       to experience. By making us understand what it is we know from
                       our experience, it makes possible action, which is our term for
                       movement directed by reason, when otherwise there would only
                       have been superstition. Without the myth, we would be slaves
                       to panic; the myth enables man to walk upright; it liberates his
                       reason from the nameless terror of the incomprehensible outside
                       and in.
                          It is because it is so real, so central, so potent, that I say, “Be-
                       ware of the Myth.” Because it is the basis of all ritual and of all
                       institutions, it is all-important that it be a true myth, truly inter-
                       preted. For a false myth, or one that is interpreted falsely, is the
                       most vicious, the most destructive thing we know. But you may
                       ask, how can a myth be true or false? Isn’t it an open contradic-
                       tion to apply such philosophical or ethical value terms to experi-
                       ence? But the myth is not just experience; it is the symbolical
                       expression of experience, which means that the myth itself is
                       already a product of our consciousness, of our reason, of our be-
                       liefs, the product of a decision as to what is relevant in our expe-
                       rience and what our experience actually means. And this applies
                       with even greater force to the interpretation of the myth—that
                       is, to ritual and action.
                          You can say that any myth is a valid myth if it has stood the
                       pragmatic test, the test of time. It could not have survived un-
                       less it expressed in a plausible symbol an experience common to
                       the human species. The myth always raises the right questions,
                       always registers the right seismic disturbances, but it does not
                       by necessity give the right answers. In fact, it gives no answers
                       at all. The answers are given by our interpretation of the myth
                       and of the experience it expresses; they are given, in brief, by
                       philosophy and theology, the two disciplines that are exclusively
                       concerned with the analysis, interpretation, and critique of the
                       basic myth. These answers may be right, but they may also be
   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35