Page 31 - The Drucker Lectures
P. 31

12 [   The Drucker Lectures

                       wrong, depending upon the principles, methods, and aims of the
                       philosopher and theologian.
                          All this, as you may now have realized, has been by way of in-
                       troduction to my assignment tonight, to speak on the “Myth of
                       the State.” The people who first talked of the state as a myth did
                       not understand the term to mean what I make it mean. On the
                       contrary, by calling the state a myth they meant to say that there
                       really is no such thing as a state, that there are only individuals
                       existing by themselves, and that it is a lie and worse to pretend
                       that there is a state. Nevertheless, the state is a true myth in the
                       sense in which I have been using the term.
                          The experience of belonging to a group, the experience that
                       the group is real, has existence and has definite qualities and,
                       you might even say, has a body, is one every one of us has had.
                       And we also know, beyond rational proof and beyond contra-
                       diction, that there are situations in which this phenomenon we
                       call “group” has more reality and more life than the individual,
                       situations in which the individual is willing to die so that the
                       group may live. You may try to explain this phenomenon ra-
                       tionally and develop the state from the biological necessity of
                       the family to care for infant and nursing mother, or from the
                       utilitarian principle that half a loaf is better than no bread at
                       all. But you won’t get very far this way. Certainly you could not
                       explain rationally that central political experience, the experi-
                       ence we call “allegiance.” You can only deny that there is such a
                       basic experience, that there is anything but the individual—but
                       that makes little more sense than to deny any other basic expe-
                       rience, such as that of our senses; it also makes you incapable of
                       any political effectiveness and action. If you are in politics, you
                       must accept the reality of the organized group as a basic experi-
                       ence of man’s life. You must accept the myth of the state as a
                       real myth, as a symbolical expression of a genuine experience,
                       common to all of us.
   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36