Page 86 - The Drucker Lectures
P. 86

Claremont Address [  67

                          We will again, I think, have to learn to innovate, for we are
                       at the end of a period of technological continuity. I know this
                       sounds very strange. All of us have been led to believe that we
                       have been living in an age of rapid technological change. And
                       then you look at the facts, and it just ain’t so. Until very recently,
                       there was no industry around for which the basic technological
                       foundations had not been laid before World War I. The com-
                       puter, you might say, was the first one of which this isn’t true.
                       Technologically we have been modifying, we have been extend-
                       ing, we have been adding on, but we have not been innovating.
                          In social innovation, which in many ways is far more impor-
                       tant than technological, we haven’t been doing much either. We
                       have been extending and we have been taking fairly well known
                       things to the four corners of the earth, but we have not greatly
                       added. We are facing a period which is far more likely to be
                       like that heroic age of innovation from about the Civil War pe-
                       riod to the First World War. The period began with the aniline
                       dyes and the first practical dynamo in 1856, and ended with the
                       electron tube in 1911. A technological innovation came out on
                       average every 14 to 17 months, leading almost immediately to
                       new businesses and new industries. And incidentally, at the risk
                       of shooting down a favorite balloon, there is no evidence that
                       technology is being diffused any faster today than at any time in
                       the past; in fact, there’s a lot of evidence that it is much slower.
                       Within nine weeks after Edison demonstrated the first electric
                       lightbulb, they sold shares in electric lightbulb companies in
                       England. And delivered lightbulbs. They didn’t light anything,
                       but within the space of a year they actually had installations in
                       Europe. The same was true of the telephone. Things just don’t
                       travel today quite that fast. It’s only that they get a great deal
                       more publicity; that is the only real difference.
                          Now, I think we face a time when major innovations are likely
                       to come, brought about by energy crises, resource problems, but
   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91