Page 347 - The Engineering Guide to LEED-New Construction Sustainable Construction for Engineers
P. 347

LEED Innovation in Design Pr ocess and Regional Priorities      309


                    Zip                Credit Available for Regional Priority Point
         City       Code                (Minimum Threshold Level and/or Option)
         Seattle,   98101   SSc1    SSc5.1   SSc6.1  EAc1        EAc2       MRc7
         WA                                          (48%/44%)   (13%)
         Boston,    02108   SSc3    SSc6.1   SSc7.1  SSc7.2      EAc2       MRc1.1
         MA                                                      (1%)       (75%)
         Phoenix,   85003   SSc2    SSc4.4   SSc7.1  WEc1        WEc3       EAc2
         AZ                                          (Opt.2)     (30%)      (3%)
         Columbia,  29201   SSc4.1  SSc6.1   WEc3    EAc1        EAc2       IEQc7.1
         SC                                  (40%)   (28%/24%)   (1%)
         Columbus,  43201   SSc6.1  EAc2     MRc1.1  MRc2        MRc3       IEQc8.1
         OH                         (1%)     (95%)   (75%)       (5%)

        TABLE 7.3.1  Example of Credits and Threshold Levels and/or Required Options Available for Regional
        Priority (RP) Points in Five Cities for LEED-NC 2009



             the country. They are listed on the USGBC website by state and are further subdivided
             by zip code (www.usgbc.org/LEED2009/). The listings are available for the LEED-NC
             rating system as well as other LEED rating systems such as Existing Buildings (EB),
             Schools, Core and Shell (CS), and Commercial Interiors (CI). In each case, six credits
             from the main LEED categories (SS, WE, EA, MR, or IEQ) were designated for possible
             RP credit, from which four may count toward the point total. Many credit subcategories
             award different numbers of points depending on the option, level of achievement, or a
             threshold value. Therefore, the designation for Regional Priority credit also gives the
             option or level to which the specific credit must be attained in order to be awarded the
             additional point. Currently, the regional priority listings only pertain to zip codes within
             the United States. Other regions of the world may be included in the future.
                 Eligible regional priority credits for five zip codes within some major US cities are
             listed in Table 7.3.1. Note the varying priorities. For example, Boston priorities focus on
             improving existing infrastructure and stormwater issues, while Phoenix has a water
             efficiency focus. Both also give priority to urban heat island mitigation and on-site
             renewable energy production.



        7.4  Discussion and Overview
             As previously mentioned in Chap. 1, the USGBC is developing guidances specific to many
             special subsets of project application types, to facilitate LEED certification and sustainable
             practices for these special types of projects. There are many special options for Innovation
             in Design credits as outlined in the various guidances being developed by the USGBC and
             its partners for specific project type categories. In addition, sometimes EP points are handled
             differently in these guidances and in the other LEED rating sytems. There are options in
             some where a credit point that is listed as an EP in LEED-NC 2.2 or 2009 may be an additional
             listed credit in the guidance or system for the particular project type. If what was once an
             EP point is counted as a credit, then this sometimes leaves open the opportunity for more
             innovation in design credits to be incorporated into the project.
   342   343   344   345   346   347   348   349   350   351   352