Page 35 - An Indispensible Resource for Being a Credible Activist
P. 35

❱❱       FEEDBACK DELIVERY

                       Having a feedback delivery policy and training for a workplace that is not used to these
                       concepts is necessary. The HR Tools entitled “Sample Feedback Delivery Policy for the
                       Management Team” and the “Sample Feedback Guidelines,” on pages 23–24, are two help-
                       ful samples that you can easily customize for your workplace. Be sure to have an hour-long
                       training session with groups of approximately 20 people to roll out this initiative. Of course,
                       any initiative is most successful with leadership demonstrating full support to all staff and
                       visibly participating. Feel free to customize and change these to suit your workplace culture
                       as needed.


              ❱❱       THE IMPORTANCE OF CRITICAL THINKING ABILITIES, LOGIC,
                       AND BEING A “REASONABLE PERSON”
                       As an HR/OD professional, you must be able to think critically, compare options rationally,
                       and be a “reasonable person.” At this point, you probably know that in the legal world there
                       is the “Reasonable Person Standard.” One source defines a reasonable person as an



                         Ordinary, prudent person who normally exercises due care while avoiding extremes of
                         both audacity and caution. Used as a test of liability in cases of negligence, this standard
                         is not applied uniformly on all persons because varying degrees of reasonableness may
                         be expected from a minor (infant), an adult, an unskilled person, or a professional such
                         as a doctor. 5


                          Another source defines “reasonable person standard” as



                         A phrase frequently used in TORT and Criminal Law to denote a hypothetical person in
                         society who exercises average care, skill, and judgment in conduct and who serves as a
                         comparative standard for determining liability. The decision whether an accused is
                         guilty of a given offense might involve the application of an objective test in which the
                         conduct of the accused is compared to that of a reasonable person under similar
                         circumstances. In most cases, persons with greater than average skills, or with special
                         duties to society, are held to a higher standard of care. For example, a physician who
                         aids a person in distress is held to a higher standard of care than is an ordinary person. 6



                          The point is, you as an HR/OD professional must be reasonable, logical, and able to
                       think rationally and critically. The last HR Tool in this chapter, entitled “Sample Critical
                       Thinking Quiz for HR/OD Professionals,” on pages 24–26, is a short but important test for
                       you to take right now in order to help you assess your own “reasonableness.”




              18       The H R Toolkit
   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40