Page 224 - The Handbook for Quality Management a Complete Guide to Operational Excellence
P. 224

n audit is a comparison of observed activities and/or results with
                                      documented  requirements.  The  evidence  provided  from  audits
                                Aforms the basis of improvement in either the element audited, or
                                in the requirements. Effective quality auditing can prevent problems by
                                uncovering situations that, while still acceptable, are trending toward an
                                eventual problem. The attention of management brought on by an unfa-
                                vorable audit report can often prevent future noncompliance.
                                   ISO 19011, Guidelines for Auditing Quality Systems, defines a quality
                                audit as a
                                  systematic,  independent  and  documented  process  for  obtaining  audit  evidence
                                  (records, statements of fact or other information, which are relevant to the audit
                                  criteria and verifiable) and evaluating it objectively to determine the extent to which
                                  the audit criteria (set of policies, procedures or requirements) are fulfilled.

                                   Review activities must meet several criteria to be considered audits.
                                Informal walk-throughs, while useful, do not qualify as systematic evalu-
                                ation, so do not meet the criteria for an audit. Examinations by employees
                                who report to the head of the function being examined are also important,
                                but are not audits. The reference to “policies, procedures or requirements”
                                implies the existence of written documentation.
                                   Undocumented quality systems are not proper subject matter for qual-
                                ity audits. Implementation is audited by comparing the planned policies,
                                procedures, or requirements with observed practices, with an eye toward
                                whether or not (1) these are properly implemented, and (2) if so, do they
                                accomplish the stated objectives?
                                   It is no surprise to find that an activity as important and as common as
                                quality audits is covered by a large number of different standards. It is in
                                the best interest of all parties that the audit activity be standardized to the
                                extent possible. One of the fundamental principles of effective auditing is
                                “no surprises,” something easier to accomplish if all parties involved use
                                the same rule book. Audit standards are, in general, guidelines that are
                                voluntarily adopted by auditor and auditee. Often the parties make com-
                                pliance mandatory by specifying the audit standard as part of a contract.


                                                                                                 211






          10_Pyzdek_Ch10_p209-226.indd   211                                                           11/16/12   4:55 PM
   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229