Page 52 - The Handbook for Quality Management a Complete Guide to Operational Excellence
P. 52

38   B u s i n e s s - I n t e g r a t e d   Q u a l i t y   S y s t e m s     A p p r o a c h e s   t o   Q u a l i t y    39



                                          Top management  Innovation
                                        Middle management            Kaizen

                                              Supervisors
                                                 Workers                      Maintenance

                                Figure 3.1  Responsibility for KAIZEN and KAIZEN’s role in process improvement
                                (Imai, 1986).



                                process to produce better results through innovation and KAIZEN. When
                                an improvement has been identified, the SOPs are changed to reflect the
                                new way of doing things. Imai (1986) illustrates the job responsibilities as
                                shown in Figure 3.1.
                                   The figure illustrates both the shared responsibility and the limited role
                                of KAIZEN in excluding radical innovations (sometimes referred to as
                                reengineering). More detailed responsibilities for KAIZEN are provided
                                in Table 3.1.
                                   Another rather considerable contribution from post-war Japan is the
                                set of lean practices documented by Taiichi Ohno of Toyota. The lean
                                methods  are  sometimes  referred  to  as  the  Toyota  Production  System
                                (due  to  their  origins),  and  include  principles  and  methodologies  for
                                improving  cycle  times  and  quality  through  the  elimination  of  waste
                                (also known by its Japanese name of muda). Lean distinguishes between
                                activities that create value, and those that don’t, with the objective to
                                improve  cycle  times  and  efficiencies,  reduce  waste  of  resources,  and
                                increase value to the customer.
                                   Taiichi  Ohno  of  Toyota  defined  the  following  five  types  of  waste
                                (Womack and Jones (1996) added the sixth):

                                    1.  Errors requiring rework. (Rework refers to any activity required to
                                       fix or repair the result of another process step. In service processes,
                                       management intervention to resolve a customer complaint may be
                                       considered rework.)
                                    2.  Work  with  no  immediate  customer,  either  internal  or  external,
                                       resulting in work in progress or finished goods inventory.
                                    3.  Unnecessary process steps.
                                    4.  Unnecessary movement of personnel or materials.
                                    5.  Waiting by employees as unfinished work in an upstream process
                                       is completed.
                                    6.  Design of product or processes that do not meet the customer’s
                                       needs.









          03_Pyzdek_Ch03_p031-056.indd   39                                                            10/29/12   5:56 PM
   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57