Page 51 - The Handbook for Quality Management a Complete Guide to Operational Excellence
P. 51

38    B u s i n e s s - I n t e g r a t e d   Q u a l i t y   S y s t e m s                                                                                           A p p r o a c h e s   t o   Q u a l i t y    39


                                   How is this possible? After all, the normal business cycle rises and
                                falls periodically and a company that is adequately staffed for peak pro-
                                duction is overstaffed when production downturns occur. The Japanese
                                manage to provide security in good times and bad in a number of ways.
                                One is by massive outsourcing of non-core business activities to suppli-
                                ers. It is not unusual to find as much as 80 percent of the value of the
                                finished product in purchased materials. Another is by making use of a
                                large  buffer  of  part-time  employees.  In  some  Japanese  companies  as
                                many as 50 percent of their employees during peak production periods
                                are part-time workers.
                                   Prevailing  wisdom  in  America  would  suggest  that  this  strategy
                                would result in a great increase in uncertainty and an overall decline in
                                quality. in Japan, however, suppliers are very tightly controlled using
                                a system known as Keiretsu. Suppliers within the Keiretsu often have
                                board members from the parent company, and from other members of
                                the  Keiretsu.  Unlike  American  businesses,  which  tend  to  deal  with
                                their suppliers at arm’s length, parent companies play a very active
                                role in  the affairs  of their suppliers. While in the  USA  a firm might
                                regularly appraise the quality of the product delivered by a supplier,
                                in Japan the parent would also carefully evaluate how the product was
                                made. If appropriate, the parent would suggest better, more economi-
                                cal  ways  to  produce  the  product.  Parent  companies  provide  larger,
                                longer-term contracts than their American counterparts, and they often
                                demand  steady  price  decreases.  The  supplier  might  be  expected  to
                                become “dedicated” to its parent, providing product only to the parent
                                and not to competitors. Continuous improvement in quality, cost, and
                                delivery  is  expected  of  all  Japanese  suppliers,  just  as  it  is  expected
                                from the employees.
                                   KAIZEN™ (a trademark of the KAIZEN Institute, Ltd.) is a philoso-
                                phy of continuous improvement, a belief that all aspects of life should be
                                constantly improved. In Japan, where the concept originated, KAIZEN
                                applies to all aspects of life, not just the workplace. In America the term is
                                usually applied to work processes.
                                   The  KAIZEN  approach  focuses  on  ongoing  incremental  improve-
                                ment  that  involves  all  stakeholders.  Over  time  these  small  improve-
                                ments  produce  changes  every  bit  as  dramatic  as  the  “big  project”
                                approach. KAIZEN does not concern itself with changing fundamental
                                systems, but seeks to optimize existing systems.
                                   All employees in an organization have responsibilities for two aspects
                                of  quality:  process  improvement  and  process  control.  Control  involves
                                taking  action  on  deviations  to  maintain  a  given  process  state.  In  the
                                absence of signals indicating that the process has gone astray, control is
                                achieved  by  adhering  to  established  standard  operating  procedures
                                (SOPs). In contrast, improvement requires experimentally modifying the









          03_Pyzdek_Ch03_p031-056.indd   38                                                            10/29/12   5:56 PM
   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56